Orissa

Sonapur

CC/8/2019

PAWAN KUMAR AGRAWAL,A.A(38)Years. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Shivshankar Singhal, Proprietor of Sunrise Bricks Industry. - Opp.Party(s)

S.K. BISWAL & K.M. MAHARANA

31 Oct 2022

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/8/2019
( Date of Filing : 28 May 2019 )
 
1. PAWAN KUMAR AGRAWAL,A.A(38)Years.
S/o-Lachman Agrawal,At/PO-Tarbha(Nuapada),PS-Tarbha.
SUBARNAPUR
ODISHA
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Shivshankar Singhal, Proprietor of Sunrise Bricks Industry.
Sector-9,Rohini,New Delhi.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MS. Upananda Purohit PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Haladhara Padhan MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 31 Oct 2022
Final Order / Judgement

 

                                              DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SUBARNAPUR

 

 

C.C. No.8 of 2019

 

 

Pawan Kumar Agrawal, S/o. Lachaman Agrawal, R/o. Tarbha (Nuapada), P.O./P.S. Tarbha, District – Subarnapur

…………..  Complainant

Vrs.

Shivshankar Singhal, Proprietor of Sunrise Braicks Industries, Sector – 9, Rohini New Delhi.

 

…………..  Opp. Parties

 

Advocate for the Complainant                                     ………….     Sri S.K. Biswal    

Advocate for the O.P.                                                   ………….     None 

 

 

Present

1.         Sri U.N.Purohit,                                President

2.         Sri H.Padhan                                     Member

 

Date of Filing Dt.28.05.2019

Date of Hearing Dt.11.10.2022

 

 

Date of Order Dt.31.10.2022

 

J U D G E M E N T

By Sri  U.N.Purohit, P.

 

The complainant filed this complaint petition U/s.12 of Consumer Protection Act 1986 claiming refund of total amount of Rs.50,000/- with Bank interest and other reliefs as well as cost of litigation.

 

The case of the complainant is that he deals with O.P. to purchase Ash Bricks Machine for personal use on 14.8.2017. The O.P. is known to one Keshaba Swadia who is brother in law of the complainant. The selling price of the machine was Rs.50,000/- including transportation charges. The O.P. insist the complainant to pay total amount of  Rs.50,000/- accordingly the complainant paid full amount through Bank from his S.B.I. A/c. No.30787814727 to A/c. No.50200007824674 of H.D.F.C. Bank, Branch at Delhi. The said O.P. is to send the machine within 30 days from the date of payment as per their contract. The O.P. neither send the machine nor received the Phone call and as finally the O.P. denied to receive phone call on 15.11.2019, the complainant finally files this complain.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-:  2  :-

The O.P. did not delivered the machine to the complainant though the complainant requested several times. The O.P. became silent and did not respond the complainant. First time the O.P. requested to wait for 6 months to the complainant but when after six months the complainant requested the O.P. was silent and avoid phone calls of the complainant.

 

Perused the complaint petition and affidavit filed by the complainant. The O.P. though received notice from this commission did not appear as such set exparte on 10.08.2022.

 

The documents filed by the complainant shows that S.B.I. Tarbha Branch A/c. No.30787814727 shows in the name of Pawan Kumar Agrawal and on 29.08.2017 an amount of Rs.50,000/- has been transferred through NEFT UTR No.SBIN717241919272 to Sunrise Bricks Industries. The complainant has also filed Xerox copy of counter foil of the said transaction which disclosed that the complainant has paid consideration for purchase of machine but the O.P. adopting unfair trade practice not yet delivered the machine to the complainant till date. The complainant has successfully prove his case, payment of consideration and unfair trade practice by the O.P.

 

O R D E R

 

Hence we direct the O.P. is to refund the consideration amount paid by the complainant i.e. Rs.50,000/- with 6% interest per annum from dt.29.08.2017 till its realization. Further the O.P. is directed to pay Rs.10,000/- as compensation and cost of litigation within Two months to the complainant from the date of order. Complaint is allowed.

 

 

            Applications pending, if any, stand disposed of in terms of the aforesaid judgment.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-:  3  :-

 

            A copy of this judgment be provided to all the parties free of cost as mandated by the Consumer Protection Act, 1986/2019. The judgment be uploaded forthwith on the website of the commission for perusal of the parties.

 

            File be consigned to record room alongwith a copy of this judgment.

 

 

Dated the 31st day of October 2022

                                                                                           Typed to my dictation

                                             I agree.                                 and corrected by me.

 

 

                 Sri H.Padhan                    Sri U.N.Purohit

                                             Member                                                                           President

                                       Dt.31.10.2022                                                                  Dt.31.10.2022                                 

 
 
[HON'BLE MS. Upananda Purohit]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Haladhara Padhan]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.