T.J.Lakshmipathy & 33 Ors. filed a consumer case on 14 Jun 2022 against Shivam yatra Service by its Proprietor Senthil & 2 Ors. in the StateCommission Consumer Court. The case no is A/131/2017 and the judgment uploaded on 26 Jan 2023.
IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
CHENNAI – 600 003.
BEFORE Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL MEMBER
F. A. No.131/2017
(Against the Order dt.01.04.2016 made in C.C. No.13/2016 on the file of
D.C.D.R.C., Chennai (South))
DATED THE 14TH DAY OF JUNE 2022
1. T.J. Lakshmipathy,
Flat No.34, G2,
Moovendar Nagar 2nd Street,
Numbal Thiruverkadu Post,
Chennai – 600 077.
2. L. Chellamma,
Flat No.34, G2,
Moovendar Nagar 2nd Street,
Numbal Thiruverkadu Post,
Chennai – 600 077.
3. Kalyankumar,
No.30/5, 3rd Trust Cross Street,
Chennai – 600 028.
4. S. Ramachandran,
No.1/60,1st Street,
Munivel Nagar,
Karanodai,
Chenai – 600 067.
5. R. Sulochammal,
No.1/60,1st Street,
Munivel Nagar,
Karanodai,
Chenai – 600 067.
6. B. Ravikannan,
No.2/198, 3rd Street Main Road,
Shanmuga Nagar,
Karanodai,
Chennai – 600 067.
7. R. Shanthi,
No.2/198, 3rd Street Main Road,
Shanmuga Nagar,
Karanodai,
Chennai – 600 067.
8. C. Padmammal,
No.2/199, Iyyappanchatram,
Periyapalayam Kootu Road,
Chennai – 600 067.
9. Ramesh,
No.6/428,Kollamitta,
Sulurpet,
Nellore District – 529 128.
10. R. Lavanya,
No.6/428,Kollamitta,
Sulurpet,
Nellore District – 529 128.
11. S. Jayammal,
Nethaji Street,
Dasratha Nagar,
Vembakkam,
Ponneri,
Tiruvallur District – 601 204.
12. K. Murali,
Nedurambakkam Village,
Panjati Post,
Ponneri Taluk,
Tiruvallur District – 601 204.
13. R. Lakshmi,
No.2/196, 1st Street Main Road,
Shanmuga Nagar,
Karanodai,
Chennai – 600 067.
14. E. Jayalakshmi,
No.1/25, Vinayagar Koil Street,
Bestapalayam Attur,
Chennai – 600067.
15. D. Ponnmal,
Devaneri Village,
Sholavaram,
Chennai – 600 067.
16. D. Murugesan,
Kozhipalayam Road,
Sholavaram Village,
Chennai – 600 067.
17. M. Usharani,
Kozhipalayam Road,
Sholavaram Village,
Chennai – 600 067.
18. D. Ramdas Naidu,
No.2/282, Darwin Street,
Attur Road,
Sholavaram Post,
Chennai – 600 067.
19. R. Lalithammal,
No.2/282, Darwin Street,
Attur Road,
Sholavaram Post,
Chennai – 600 067.
20. K. Muniratnam,
NGO Nagar,
Ponneri Taluk,
Chennai – 600 067.
21. M. Yasodammal,
NGO Nagar,
Ponneri Taluk,
Chennai – 600 067.
22. S. Vittobai,
Veklacheri Village,
Tirutani Taluk.
23. K. Varalakshmi,
Amreespuram,
Arokonam Taluk.
24. S. Subashini Ammal,
No.8, Kannadasan Street,
Ayyappakkam,
Ambattur,
Chennai – 600 058.
25. M. Muthu Naidu,
VGP Medu near Attur Medu,
Sholavaram Post,
Chennai – 600 067.
26. J. Muniammal,
Periyar Nagar,
Near Naranambedu,
Sholavaram Post,
Chennai – 600 067.
27. R. Sargunam,
Attur Main Road,
Attur Village,
Sholavaram,
Chennai – 600 067.
28. S. Poongodi,
Attur Main Road,
Attur Village,
Sholavaram,
Chennai – 600 067.
29. G. Padma,
Azhivanjiam Village,
Sholavaram Post,
Ponneri Taluk,
Chennai – 600 067.
30. R. Sivalingam,
“Green House”,
No.19, Keela Kavalkaran,
Samayapuram Road,
Manachannalur,
Trichy District – 621 005.
31. S. Rajeswari,
“Green House”,
No.19, Keela Kavalkaran,
Samayapuram Road,
Manachannalur,
Trichy District – 621 005.
32. S. Parthiban,
“Green House”,
No.19, Keela Kavalkaran,
Samayapuram Road,
Manachannalur,
Trichy District – 621 005.
33. S. Karthikeyan,
“Green House”,
No.19, Keela Kavalkaran,
Samayapuram Road,
Manachannalur,
Trichy District – 621 005.
34. P. Manikandan,
No.30, Bahratiyar Street,
Chrompet,
Chennai – 600 044. ... Appellants / Complainants.
-Versus-
1. M/s. Shivam Yatra Service,
Represented by its Proprietor
Mr. Senthil,
New No.79, TSV Koil Street,
Mylapore,
Chennai – 600 004.
2. Muthukumar,
Manager,
M/s. Shivam Yatra Service,
New No.79, TSV Koil Street,
Mylapore,
Chennai – 600 004.
3. S. Vaidyalingam,
Guide,
M/s. Shivam Yatra Service,
New No.79, TSV Koil Street,
Mylapore,
Chennai – 600 004.. .. Respondents / Opposite parties.
Counsel for the Appellants / Complainants : M. Muthu Kannan
Respondents / Opposite parties : Served called absent
This appeal coming up before us on 14.06.2022 for appearance of the appellants and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:
Docket Order
No representation for the appellants. There was no representation for the appellants continuously for the past several hearings.
This appeal is posted today for appearance of the appellant and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal.
When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., the appellants were not present. Hence, passed over and called again at 01.00 P.M. still, there was no representation for the appellants. Hence, we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the case.
Hence, this appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to costs.
Sd/- Sd/-
R.VENKATESAPERUMAL R.SUBBIAH
MEMBER PRESIDENT
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.