Delhi

North East

CC/234/2014

Tikam Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Shiva Stores & etc. - Opp.Party(s)

29 Feb 2016

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM: NORTH EAST

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

D.C. OFFICE COMPLEX, BUNKAR VIHAR, NAND NAGRI, DELHI-93

 

Complaint Case No. 234/14

In the matter of:

 

 

Tikam Singh

S/o Late Shri Babu Singh

R/o House No. D-117,

Gali No. 4, Ganga Vihar, Delhi-94.

 

 

 

 

Complainant

 

 

       

 

Versus

 

 

 

  1. Shiva Stores

Through its Proprietor

1449/100, Ft. Road

Durgapuri, Delhi-93.

  1. Maxx Mobilink Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi)

2nd Floor, 16B/3, Desh Bandhu Gupta Road, Karol Bagh,

Delhi-110020

  1. Maxx

Through its General Manager,

16th Floor, D.L.H. Corporation Park,

Opposite Gore Goan N.T.N.L.,

S.V. Road Gore Goan Mumbai West 400062

 

 

 

Opposite Parties

 

 

 

           

DATE OF INSTITUTION:

 22.04.2014

 

DATE OF DECISION      :

 29.02.2016

N.K. Sharma, President

Nishat Ahmad Alvi, Member

Ms. Manju Bala Sharma

 

Order

 

  1.           The case of the complainant is that on 24.8.2013 complainant purchased a mobile set of Max Company for Rs. 3100/- with one year warranty. Immediately after its purchase there was problem of display in the handset and the complainant visited OP1 who asked him to go the OP2 or OP4, the service centers of OP1 and the complainant took the mobile there but the problem could not be rectified. On 18.11.2013 the complainant again took the mobile set to OP2 but it could not be rectified. On 29.12.2013 the complainant took the mobile to OP4 but in vain. It is further stated that the complainant made complaint to OP3, the manufacturer of the mobile set  also. On 04.06.2014 OP4 told the complainant that there are so many problems, in the mobile phone like handset, touch, charging and ear lead and got deposited the mobile set with him and did not return the same till date despite several visits of the complainant. Pleading deficiency in service the complainant prayed that OPs be directed to replace the defective mobile set with new mobile set or refund the cost of the mobile i.e. Rs. 3100/-, compensation of Rs. 10,000/- towards physical and mental agony suffered by the complainant and pay Rs. 5000/- as litigation cost.
  2.           Notice was issued to all the OPs but nobody entered appearance on their behalf, hence proceeded against ex-parte. However, Ms Vinita Advocate appeared on behalf of OP2 on 06.10.2015 and sought adjournment to argue the matter and inspect the file but did not appear on 12.11.2015, the date fixed for arguments and arguments were heard and the matter was reserved for order.
  3.           Heard and perused the record.
  4.           Affidavit of evidence has been filed by the complainant.
  5.           The documents filed by the complainant are the receipt of the mobile hand set of 24.08.2015 alongwith the job sheets of OPs service centre dated 18.11.2013, 29.12.2013, 25.04.2014 and 04.06.2014. Perusal of these job sheets establishes that the mobile set was not working due to which time and again complainant visited the OPs for its repair and lastly it was deposited on 04.06.2014 after which it was not returned to the complainant after its repair despite his several visits to the OP centers.
  6.           Thus the complainant has established his case as OPs failed to controvert the same. Hence complainant’s case is deemed to be proved.
  7.           Hence holding OPs guilty jointly and severally for deficiency in service and harassment we direct the OPs either to replace the mobile set with a new one or refund the cost of Rs. 3100/- to the complainant. Compensation of Rs. 5000/- for the harassment and suffering of the complaint is also granted. We also award Rs. 2000/- as cost of litigation.
  8.           The order shall be complied with by the OPs within 30 days from the date of receipt of the order failing which interest @ 12% per annum  is awarded on Rs. 3100/-, the cost of the mobile from the date of order till realisation.
  9.           Let a copy of this order be sent to each party, free of cost, as per regulation 21 of the Consumer Protection Regulations, 2005.
  10.              File be consigned to Record Room. 
  11.              Announced On 29.02.2016

 

(N.K.Sharma)                   (Nishat Ahmad Alvi)           (Manju Bala Sharma)

     President                     Member                                   Member          

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.