PER JUSTICE J.M. MALIK 1. Counsel for the petitioner present. None for the respondent. We have perused the record. It transpires that exparte order against the respondent was passed by the State Commission. The respondent did not appear for three hearings, therefore, there is no need to summon the respondent. The impugned order dated 03.12.2013 runs as follows:- “03.12.2013 Present: None for the Appellant. None for the Respondent. Put up at 12:30 pm. Sd/- (S.A.Siddiqui) Member (Judicial) Sd/- (S.C.Jain) Member 1) Called out again at 12:30 pm. 2) On several times. 3) None for the Appellant. 4) None for the Respondent. 5) Appeal is therefore dismissed in default/non prosecution, file be consigned to record room. Sd/- (S.A.Siddiqui) Member (Judicial) Sd/- (S.C.Jain) Member” 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he mis-noted the date. This is no ground. However, in the interest of justice, we restore the case before the State Commission subject to payment of costs of Rs. 5,000/-, which will be deposited with the Legal Aid of State Commission. 3. The petitioner is directed to appear before the State Commission on 27.03.2014. The State Commission will proceed further in the case as per Law, after satisfaction that the costs stand paid, otherwise the State Commission will dismiss the case in default. 4. The Revision Petition stands disposed of. | 
