NCDRC

NCDRC

MA/131/2013

SHREE AHUJA PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. - Complainant(s)

Versus

SHEWA APARTMENTS CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. & 32 ORS. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. TARUN GUPTA

22 Mar 2013

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 131 OF 2013
 
IN
RP/4572/2012
1. SHREE AHUJA PROPERTIES PVT. LTD.
...........Appellants(s)
Versus 
1. SHEWA APARTMENTS CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. & 32 ORS.
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. VINEETA RAI, PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. DR. S.M. KANTIKAR, MEMBER

For the Appellant :NEMO
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 22 Mar 2013

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

For Petitioner                    :     Mr. Mohit Bhansali, Advocate

(RPs 4539 & 4540 of 2012    

(respondents in RPs 4572 & 4573 of 2012)

                          

For Respondent                :     Mr. N.Gupta and Mr. Tarun Gupta,

(RPs 4539 & 4540 of 2012)     Advocates

(Petitioner in RPs 4572 & 4573 of 2012)

 

Proxy counsel appearing for the opp.party/applicant states that Mr.Nidhesh Gupta, Sr.Advocate who was to argue this application has not been able to come today on account of illness of his father.  Counsel for the petitioner/complainant opposes adjournment on the ground that he has come all the way from Mumbai as the applicant had personally sent the notice to him.

        We have perused the application.  No ground for early hearing is made out.  M.A. dismissed.

 
......................
VINEETA RAI
PRESIDING MEMBER
......................
DR. S.M. KANTIKAR
MEMBER