Kerala

StateCommission

A/16/792

Project Officer,IT AT SCHOOL - Complainant(s)

Versus

SHERIEF - Opp.Party(s)

MEENA C R

05 Dec 2019

ORDER

 

 

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL

COMMISSION  VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

APPEAL No.792/16

                                              JUDGMENT DATED:05.12.2019

 

PRESENT : 

HON’BLE JUSTICE K. SURENDRA MOHAN                  : PRESIDENT

SHRI. T.S.P. MOOSATH                                                         : JUDICIAL MEMBER

SHRI. RANJIT.R                                                                      : MEMBER

 

1. Project Officer,

          IT @ School,

          Thiruvananthapuram-695 012.

                                                                                                     : APPELLANTS

2. Co-ordinator,

          IT @ School,

          Thiruvananthapuram-695 012.

 

(By Adv: Smt. Meena.C.R)

 

                Vs.

 

1. Sherif.V,

         Assistant Teacher,

         GVHSS, Keezhuparamb,PIN- 673 639.

                                                                                                              : RESPONDENTS

 Marhama House,

       Thrikkalayoor, Keezhuparambu,

       Areacode, Malappuram-673 639.

 

2. M/s HCL Infosystem Limited,

          Sector XI, E4, 586, Noida, PIN -201 301, India.

 

JUDGMENT 

HON’BLE JUSTICE  K. SURENDRA MOHAN : PRESIDENT

 

This appeal is directed against the order dated:31.05.2016 of the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Malappuram (hereinafter referred to as the District Forum for short) in CC.96/2014.  Opposite parties 2 and 3 are the appellants before us.  Opposite party No.1 is the 2^nd respondent and the complainant is the 1^st respondent.

On receipt of notice in this appeal, the 2^nd respondent herein has filed a reply.   Paragraph 3 thereof reads as follows:-

“That the respondent No.2 (HCL Infosystems Ltd.) received the order copy on 9^th September 2016 after which a cheque amounting Rs.36,978/- (Cheque No.521019 dated:12.09.2016) was handed over to the complainant on 14.10.2016 which was duly received by the complainant.  Copy of cheque duly received by the complainant is attached herewith as Annexure –A.”

In view of the above nothing further remains to be considered in this appeal for the reason that, the direction in the order appealed against has already been complied with in full by the 2^nd respondent by making payment of the entire amount ordered to be paid, to the 1^st respondent herein.  Obviously for the above reason, the 1^st respondent/complainant has not appeared, though he has  received notice from this Commission.

In view of the above state of affairs, this appeal is disposed of recording that, the direction of the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Malappuram in CC.96/14, the order against which this appeal is filed has already been complied with by the 2^nd respondent herein and that the said order remains satisfied.  Recording to the above facts this appeal is disposed of.

In view of the above the appellant has no further liability to discharge as per the order appealed against.

 

JUSTICE K. SURENDRA MOHAN : PRESIDENT

 

 T.S.P. MOOSATH : JUDICIAL MEMBER

 

RANJIT.R : MEMBER

 

VL.