NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/4315/2009

DISTT. LITERACY & CONTINUING EDUCATION OFFICER & ORS. - Complainant(s)

Versus

SHARWAN KUMAR KHARIWAL - Opp.Party(s)

MR. MILIND KUMAR

08 Dec 2009

ORDER

Date of Filing: 20 Nov 2009

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/4315/2009
(Against the Order dated 07/02/2008 in Appeal No. 2110/2003 of the State Commission Rajasthan)
1. DISTT. LITERACY & CONTINUING EDUCATION OFFICER & ORS.District Literacy & Continuing Education Officer, BhilwaraRajsthan ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. SHARWAN KUMAR KHARIWALS/o Rhikab Chand Khariwal R/o Bara Mahua, BhilwaraRajsthan.2. DIRECTOR. LITERACY & CONTINUING EDUCATION Jaipur Rajasthan 3. COLLECTOR. BHHILWARA Through State of Rajasthan ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN ,PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. B.K. TAIMNI ,MEMBER
For the Appellant :MR. MILIND KUMAR
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 08 Dec 2009
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

          There is a delay of 562 days in filing the Revision Petition, which is over and above the period of 90 days statutorily given to file the Revision Petition. Under the Consumer Protection Act, the consumer fora are required to decide the case within a period of 90 days from the date of filing, in case, no evidence is required to be taken and within 150 days, wherever evidence is required to be taken. Delay of 562 days cannot be condoned without sufficient cause being shown. We have gone through the application for condonation of delay. The only reason given for condonation of delay is that the file was moving from table to table to seek permission to file the Revision Petition.
We are not satisfied with the cause shown. Application for condonation of delay is dismissed.   Consequently, the Revision Petition is dismissed as barred by limitation.


......................JASHOK BHANPRESIDENT
......................B.K. TAIMNIMEMBER