Chandigarh

DF-I

CC/122/2010

Rinku - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sharma Electronics - Opp.Party(s)

30 Apr 2010

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CONSUMER CASE NO. 122 of 2010
1. RinkuS/o Sh. Sher Singh House No. 2148 Dainik Bhaskar Sector-25 Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Sharma Electronicsmain Road Opposite Housing Board Gurdwara Dhanas UT Cahndigarh through its Proprietor2. M/s Videocon SCO No. 80-82 2nd Floor Sector-17/D Chandigarhthrough its Manager ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 30 Apr 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HELD IN DISTRICT FORUM-I, U.T.

CHANDIGARH

                                                                       

 

                                                                        Consumer Complaint No. 122 of 2010

 

 

Rinku s/o Sh.Sher Singh, H.No.2148, Dainik Bhaskar, Sector 25, Chandigarh                                                                                                                                     Complainant.

                        Versus

1.         Sharma Electronics, Main Road, Opposite Housing Board Gurdwara, Dhanas, UT Chandigarh, through its Proprietor.

2.         M/s Videocon, SCO No.80-82, 2nd Floor, Sector 17-D, Chandigarh, through its Manager.                                                                   

                                                                                                            Opposite Parties(OPs)

 Present:            Sh.Gaurav Bhardwaj, Advocate for Complainant.

                        None for OP No.1.

Mrs.Vijayata Sharma, Advocate for OP No.2.

                       

Dated, the 30th day of April, 2010.

 

                         ORDER

 

1.                     This case has been taken up today in the Lok Adalat. Efforts were made to settle the matter, which stood fructified and the parties have settled the dispute. Statement given by learned counsel for the parties is reproduced as under:-

“Statement of Mrs.Vijayata Sharma, Advocate for OP No.2.

 

The matter has been settled between the parties. As per settlement, the OP No.2 shall replace the refrigerator in question of the complainant with brand new one having fresh warranty within fifteen days from today i.e. 30.4.2010. The OP No.2 will deduct the amount of Rs.6200/- already paid by the complainant, from the total invoice amount of the new refrigerator.

 

Statement of Sh.Gaurav Bhardwaj, Advocate for Complainant.

I accept the above statement given by Ms.Vijayata Sharma, Advocate for OP No.2. The complaint may be disposed of accordingly. ‘

 

2.                     In view of the above statements, the complaint stands disposed of. The OP No.2 would replace the refrigerator in question of the complainant with brand new one having fresh warranty within 15 days from today i.e. 30.4.2010. Further, the OP No.2 would deduct the amount of Rs.6200/- already paid by the complainant, from the total invoice amount of the new refrigerator. 

3.                     Copies of this order free of cost be supplied to the parties. The file be consigned.                          

 

                                                                                                PRESIDING MEMBER

            LOK ADALAT.

 

 

 

3rd MEMBER                         2nd MEMBER                    1st MEMBER

 

 


DR. MRS MADANJIT KAUR SAHOTA, MEMBER MR. RAJINDER SINGH GILL, PRESIDING MEMBER ,