Maharashtra

StateCommission

A/10/1162

M/S MURARI ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS - Complainant(s)

Versus

SHANTARAM RANJIT PAWAR - Opp.Party(s)

P B KADAM

10 Jan 2011

ORDER

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL
COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI
 
First Appeal No. A/10/1162
(Arisen out of Order Dated 28/10/2010 in Case No. Ea 38/2009 of District Raigarh)
 
1. M/S MURARI ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS
SHOP NO 6 PLOT NO 11 MAGNUM APT SECTOR 11 NEW PANVEL
RAIGAD
MAHARASHTRA
2. RAJENDRA OMPRAKASH AGARWAL
SHOP NO 6 PLOT NO 11 MAGNUM APT SECTOR 11 NEW PANVEL
RAIGAD
MAHARASHTRA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SHANTARAM RANJIT PAWAR
R/AT FLAT NO B 302 3 RD FLOOR MURARI PURUSHOTTAM AJINKYATARA BUILDING PLOT NO 18 24 AND 24 (1) SECTOR 6/A KAMOTHE NAVIMUMBAI
RAIGAD
MAHARASHTRA
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 Hon'ble Mr. S.R. Khanzode PRESIDING MEMBER
 Hon'ble Mr. Dhanraj Khamatkar Member
 
PRESENT:Mr.S.I.Jayakar-Advocate @ Mr.P.B.Kadam-Advocate for the appellant
 Mr.Anil Jadhav-Advocate for the respondent
ORDER

Per Mr.S.R.Khanzode, Hon’ble Presiding Judicial Member

Heard Mr.S.I.Jayakar-Advocate @ Mr.P.B.Kadam-Advocate for the appellant. Mr.Anil Jadhav-Advocate for the respondent.  Respondent also present in person. 

This is an appeal u/sec.27-A of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the order dated 28/10/2010 passed in Execution Application no.38/2009 passed by Raigad District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Alibag and whereby, under section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, the appellant/org.O.P. was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for six months and fine of `5000/-.

It appears that both the parties have settled their dispute out of Commission in terms of the consent terms filed today marked as Exhibit ‘X’.  Original complainant also sworn affidavit and personally stated before us that initial order dated 25/06/2009 stands now complied with.  In view of this since the conviction is related to non compliance of the impugned order and since the impugned order stands complied with, we allow the appeal and pass following order:-

                                                          ORDER

Appeal is allowed.

The conviction and sentence awarded as per impugned order dated 28/10/2010 passed in execution application no.38/2009, stands set aside. 

In the result appellant/O.P./accused is acquitted of the offence punishable under section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.  Bail bond stands cancelled.

Copies of the order be furnished to the parties.

 

 
 
[Hon'ble Mr. S.R. Khanzode]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[Hon'ble Mr. Dhanraj Khamatkar]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.