West Bengal

Kolkata-II(Central)

CC/264/2021

Shankar Prasad Pahari - Complainant(s)

Versus

Shamin Ahmed - Opp.Party(s)

Suman Das

16 Sep 2021

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)
8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,
KOLKATA-700087.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/264/2021
( Date of Filing : 13 Apr 2021 )
 
1. Shankar Prasad Pahari
Vidyasagar Colony,P.S. Marishda,P.O.Contai,Dist-Purba Medinipur,Pin-721401,West Bengal.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Shamin Ahmed
38B/1, Abdul Halim Lane, P.S. Taltala, Kolkata-700016,West Bengal.
2. Sayid Uzzaman
38B/1, Abdul Halim Lane, P.S. Taltala, Kolkata-700016,West Bengal.
3. Nafis Ahmed
38B/1, Abdul Halim Lane, P.S. Taltala, Kolkata-700016,West Bengal.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Swapan Kumar Mahanty PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Sahana Ahmed Basu MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Ashoke Kumar Ganguly MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 16 Sep 2021
Final Order / Judgement

Order No. 02 Date -16.09.2021

 

            Today is fixed for admission hearing.

            Ld. Advocate for the complainant is present.

Heard the Ld. Advocate for the complainant who submits that the complainant is a monthly tenant in respect of one room with attached bath and privy measuring about 96 sq. ft. situated at Premises No. 38B/1, Abdul Halim Lane, Kolkata-700016 under the predecessor–in–interest of Late Gopal Chandra Ghosh, on his demise Late Subhas Chandra Ghosh and lastly under the OPs. He further submits that by virtue of an written agreement dated 31.08.2012 the OPs intent to construct a multi stored building on the said premises after demolishing existing structure standing thereon and in terms of the agreement the OPs are liable to deliver his proportionate portion of room on the said building but despite repeated requests the OPs did not hand over possession of the subject room. Hence, the consumer complaint.

            Having heard the Ld. Advocate for the complainant coupled with complaint petition along with its annexure thereto, we are of the view that the subject matter of the dispute is not amenable in this commission and the complaint is not admitted. As a result, the complaint is rejected.

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Swapan Kumar Mahanty]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Sahana Ahmed Basu]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Ashoke Kumar Ganguly]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.