Kerala

Wayanad

CC/29/2017

Thottoli Maimoona, W/o Majeed, Thottoli House, Aruval, Porunnannur amsom desom, Mananthavady Taluk - Complainant(s)

Versus

Shameer, S/o Muhammed, Thekkethil House, Cheeral Post - Opp.Party(s)

04 Apr 2017

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
CIVIL STATION ,KALPETTA
WAYANAD-673122
PHONE 04936-202755
 
Complaint Case No. CC/29/2017
 
1. Thottoli Maimoona, W/o Majeed, Thottoli House, Aruval, Porunnannur amsom desom, Mananthavady Taluk
Mananthavady
Wayanad
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Shameer, S/o Muhammed, Thekkethil House, Cheeral Post
Cheeral
Wayanad
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Jose V. Thannikode PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Renimol Mathew MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Chandran Alachery MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 04 Apr 2017
Final Order / Judgement

By Sri. Chandran Alachery, Member:

 

The complaint is filed under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act for an order directing Opposite party to return Rs.1,85,000/- to the Complainant towards price of the vehicle with 18% interest from 20.09.2016 till payment, to give the Complainant Rs.32,000/- that the Complainant paid towards the loan instalments, Rs.10,000/- paid by the Complainant towards tax Rs.4,000/- towards welfare fund contribution, Rs.10,000/- incured by the Complainant for vehicle repair, to pay Rs.1,00,000/- as compensation and also to pay the cost of the proceedings.

 

2. On verifying the complaint, the Forum noticed that the Complaint is based on an agreement between two persons with respect to a vehicle transaction. In the Complaint, the Complainant alleged cheating from the side of Opposite Party. Hence before issuing notice to the Opposite Party, notice was issued to the Complainant for preliminary hearing on maintainability of complaint.

3. Heard the Complainant. On verifying the agreement produced along with the Complaint, the Forum found that no terms in the agreement is violated by the Opposite Party. The allegation of the Complainant is that the Opposite party had sold a fully engine damaged vehicle to the Complainant after receiving purchase price etc. The 6th para in the Complainant reads that “the Complainant firmly believes that the Opposite Party has supplied a useless vehicle with forged engine to the Complainant and thereby cheated the Complainant by obtaining Rs.1,85,000/- from the Complainant”. Hence it is very clear in the complaint that the Complainant mainly alleged cheating against the Opposite Party.

 

4. On verifying the entire complaint and on hearing the Complaint on maintainability, the Forum found that since the Complainant alleged cheating against the Opposite Party, complaint before the Forum under Consumer Protection Act is not maintainable.

 

In the result, the complaint is dismissed.

 

Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by him and corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Forum on this the 4th day of April 2017.

Date of Filing:01.02.2017.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Jose V. Thannikode]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Renimol Mathew]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MR. Chandran Alachery]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.