Orissa

Baleshwar

CC/47/2016

Smt. Tilotama Mahakud, aged about 46 years - Complainant(s)

Versus

Shakti Traders, Authorised Dealer- New Holland Tractors & Authorised Distributor- Filed King Rotary - Opp.Party(s)

Sj. Niranjan Hota & Others

26 Jun 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASORE
AT- KATCHERY HATA, NEAR COLLECTORATE, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/47/2016
( Date of Filing : 06 Apr 2016 )
 
1. Smt. Tilotama Mahakud, aged about 46 years
W/o. Purnachandra Mahakud, At- Talanagar, P.O- B.M Pur, P.S- Soro, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Shakti Traders, Authorised Dealer- New Holland Tractors & Authorised Distributor- Filed King Rotary Tiller, Balasore
At- Ganeswarpur (In front of Tentulia Thakurani Mandir), P.O- Januganj, Dist- Balasore-756019.
Odisha
2. Magma HDI, Managing Director, Kolkata
General Insurance Company Ltd., Magma House, 24, Park Street, Kolkata-700016.
West Bengal
3. Branch Manager, Magma Fincrop Ltd., Balasore
1st Floor, Sahadevkhunta (In front of Canara Bank), At/P.O- Balia, Dist- Balasore-756001.
Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 Sri Priyabrata Ray & Others, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
Dated : 26 Jun 2023
Final Order / Judgement

                                         The case record is posted today for hearing of the case. Neither the complainant nor her Advocate is present nor taken any step. Advocate for the OP No.1 is present and files hazira and other Ops are absent. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of the complainant and contesting Ops No.2 & 3. Hence, hearing of the case could not be taken up.   

                                         In the present case, OP No.1 & 2 were appeared and filed their respective written versions, whereas OP No.3 though appeared, but did not file written version. As it appears from the case record, the complainant did not turn up and slept over the matter since 15.07.2020 and no step is taken nor did her advocate take any step on her behalf, for which hearing of the case impaired and further the valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and the nature and conduct of the complainant, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the complainant should be dismissed.                      

                                         Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.