Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/867/2012

1. M/s. Birla Sun Life Insurance Co. Ltd., By its Managing Director, G Corp Tech Park 5 and 5th Floor, kasarwadavalli, Ghodbunder Road,Thane-400601, Mumbai - Complainant(s)

Versus

Shaik Sirajunnissa, N/o Shaik Ataullal, Muslim, Housewife, R/o. 11-36B Islampet, Near Police Station - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. D.V.Ramakrishna Sarma

10 Jul 2013

ORDER

 
FA No: 867 Of 2012
(Arisen out of Order Dated 03/07/2012 in Case No. CC/339/2011 of District Krishna at Vijaywada)
 
1. 1. M/s. Birla Sun Life Insurance Co. Ltd., By its Managing Director, G Corp Tech Park 5 and 5th Floor, kasarwadavalli, Ghodbunder Road,Thane-400601, Mumbai
2. 2. M/s. Birla Sun Life Insurance Co. ltd., By its Manager, near benz Circle, Opposite to ICICI Bank,
Upstairs of khazana jewellery, M.G. Road, Vijayawada.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Shaik Sirajunnissa, N/o Shaik Ataullal, Muslim, Housewife, R/o. 11-36B Islampet, Near Police Station, gannavaram, Vijayawada krishna Dist. -520001.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO PRESIDING MEMBER
 HONABLE MR. T.Ashok Kumar MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

BEFORE THE CIRCUIT BENCH A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT VIJAYAWADA

F.A.No.867 

 

Between   

1.  M/s Birla Sun Life Insurance Co.Ltd.,
By its Managing Director,
G Corp Tech Park 5 and 5th Thane-601, Mumbai

2.  M/s Birla Sun Life Insurance Co.Ltd.,
By its Manager, Near Benz Circle, Jewellery, M.G.Road, Vijayawada

                                                       

       

 

Shaik Sirajunnissa W/o Shaik Ataullal,
Housewife R/o 11-36B, Islampet, Vijayawada-001, Krishna Dist.
                                                                

Counsel for the Appellant             

Counsel for the Respondents                    

 QUORUM:       SRI R.LAKSHMINARSIMHA RAO, HON’BLE MEMBER

                                                                      

 

                       

                                 

 

                  

1.    

2.    

3.    

4.    

           

However, without admitting any liability under the Policy, we have decided to refund the Cash Surrender Value under the Policy as exgratia. 

 

 5.           

       

 

A)

Life Style Information

 

6)

Do you smoke cigarettes/bidis or use of any other form of tobacco like pan gutkha etc

No

(D)

Have you ever had or sought advice for the following

 

 

(e)

Ulcer, Chronic, Diarrhea, hepatitis or jaundice or other liver or diagnosed disorders

No

f)

Cancer, tumor, thyroid disorder enlarged glands, enlarged lymph nodes

No

5)

Do you have any health symptoms or complalint for which the Physicians has not been consulted or treatment received.

No

       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.      The appellant contends that the claim investigation revealed that the insured was a smoker. The appellant had taken shelter under Section 45 of the Insurance Act which reads as under:

               45.

 

 

7.    

       “(a) the statement must be on a material matter or must suppress facts which it was material to disclose,

 (b)   

 (c ) the policy holder must have known at the time of making the statement that it was false or that it suppressed facts which it was material to disclose.”

 

8.    

8

Within the past 12 months have you used any products alcohol or nicotine

No

10

Are you on a diet or taking any vitamin herbal, medicine reducing pills or other mediine of any kind?

 

11

Have you ever been examined for or treated for high blood, pressure, stroke heart trouble, diabetes, cancer, tumour, chest pain, digestive tract disorder or had such treatment been recommended by Physicians or Other Practitioner

No

13

Since the Applicatoin for this Policy, have you

 

a.

Consulted any doctor or other health Practitioner

No

b.

Been told you or sought advice for any illness disease or injury

No

c.

Submitted to ECG, X-ray blood test or other tests?

No

d.

Been submitted or been admitted/advised to be advised as inpatient in hospital or clinic except for pregnance birth or routine check up

No

 

 

 

       

 

 

 

 

 

9.    

i)            Life Insurance Corporation of India vs Asha Goel & another-AIR 2001 SC 549.

ii)          Satwant Kaur vs New India Insurance Company Ltd- SC2776(2002)

 

10.   

11.            

       The purpose for taking a policy of insurance is not, in our opinion, very material. It may serve the purpose of social security but then the same should not be obtained with a fraudulent act by the insured. Proposal can be repudiated if a fraudulent act is discovered. The proposer must show that his intention was. It must appear from the face of the record. In a case of this nature it was not necessary for the insurer to establish that the suppression was fraudulently made by the policy holder or that he must have been aware at the time of making the statement that the same was false or that the fact was suppressed which was material to disclose. A deliberate wrong answer which has a great bearing on the contract of insurance, if discovered may lead to the policy being vitiated in law.”

 

12.           

Thus it needs little emphasis that when an information on a specific aspect is asked for in the proposal form, an assured is under a solemn obligation to make a true and full disclosure of the information on the subject which is within his knowledge. It is not for proposer to determine whether the information is sought for is material for the purpose of the policy or not”.

 

 

13.            

14.           

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   కె.ఎం.కె*

 

 

 
 
[HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HONABLE MR. T.Ashok Kumar]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.