STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

U.T.,CHANDIGARH

1.   M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd. through its CEO, Registered Office-115, Ansal Bhawan 16, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi – 110001.

2.   M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd. through its Branch Manager, SCO 183-184, Sector 9-C, Madhya Marg,Chandigarh.

…..Revision Petitioners/Opposite Parties.

Versus

Sh. S.S.Walia, son of Hazara Singh resident of House No.1011, Sector 43-B,Chandigarh.

             Revision Petition under Section 17(1)(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

BEFORE:   

Argued by:

PER DEV RAJ, MEMBER

2.      

3.     

4.                

5.               

6.               

7.                

8.     

9.                These documents were already in possession of the Opposite Parties when they were given an opportunity to submit their evidence. They could easily produce the same, had they exercised due diligence at that time. The documents pertained to the year 2010; the complaint was filed by the respondent/complainant was registered on 01.07.2013.

10.              

11.              Not only this, the District Forum was also right in holding that the documents sought to be produced, were also not relevant and essential for the just decision of the complaint.

12.             

13.             

14.             

15.              08.01.2014 at 10.30 A.M. and the case shall be taken up by it (District Forum) from the stage, at which, it was pending.

16.                The District Forum record, alongwith a certified copy of the order, be sent back, to it, immediately, so as to reach there, well before the date and time fixed i.e. 08.01.2014 at 10.30 A.M.

17.              Certified Copies of this order, be sent to the parties, free of charge.

18.             The Revision Petition file be consigned to the Record Room, after due completion.

Pronounced.

December 30, 2013                                                              [JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER (RETD.)]

PRESIDENT

Sd/-

[DEV RAJ]

MEMBER

Ad

STATE COMMISSION

(Revision Petition No.37 of 2013)

Argued by:

Dated the     

ORDER

                   08.01.2014 at 10.30 A.M. and the case shall be taken up by the District Forum from the stage, at which, it was pending.

Ad