Case is called out.

Sh. Abhishek Prabhakar, learned counsel for the appellant and Sh. Prateek Handa, learned counsel for respondent  No. 1, are present.  None is present on behalf of respondent No. 2, who has been arrayed in this appeal as proforma respondent.

A Compromise Deed has been filed on behalf of the appellant and respondent No. 1 through his brother / Power of Attorney Holder Sh. Sanju S/o Sh. Kunwar Singh.  The Compromise Deed has been verified by learned counsel for the appellant and respondent No. 1.

In the Compromise Deed, it has been mentioned that the appellant will pay Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand Only) to respondent No. 1 towards mental agony and cost of litigation and the appellant will provide one year warranty in regard to the motorcycle in question.  It is further mentioned in the Compromise Deed that the respondent No. 1 will get regular service of the vehicle done from the authorised service centre and the respondent No. 1 has taken the physical possession of the vehicle in question to his full satisfaction.  Therefore, there remains no dispute between the parties.  It is endorsed on the back of Compromise Deed that the Power of Attorney Holder of respondent No. 1 has received sum of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand Only) from the appellant.

Learned counsel for the appellant and respondent No. 1 state that this appeal may be decided in terms of the compromise.

Order

Accordingly, the appeal is decided in terms of the compromise, which shall form part of the order.

The amount deposited by the appellant with this Commission, be released in its favour.

Let the record be consigned.