Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/109/2019

Osuri Devendra Phanikar, S/o Gangadharan, H.No.11-437, Osuri Mension, 21st ward , Peechupalem, Narsapur-534 275 West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh State. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sethu Madhavan, S/o Gangadharan, Sole Proprietor, Indico Homes, D.No.110-D, ELK Hill Road, Opposite - Opp.Party(s)

Party in Person

17 Mar 2023

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                              BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                                   Thiru.R.VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::      MEMBER

 

 CC. No. 109/2019

                                                        DATED THIS THE  17^TH DAY OF MARCH 2023

 

Osuri Devendra Phanikar,

S/o Gangadharam , Age 65 years

H.No. 11-4 37, Osuri Mansion,

21^st Ward, Peechupalem,

Narsapur – 534275 West Godavari District,

Andhra Pradesh State                                                     ..Complainant

 

                                            Vs

 

T.Sethu Madhavan,

S/o Gangadharan, Age 45 years,

Sole Proprietor,

Indigo Homes,

D.No. 110-D, Elk Hill Road, Opposite Rose Garden,

Udhagamandalam (Ooty) – 643 001  

Nilgiris District, Tamil Nadu State                                 ..Opposite party

 

Counsel for the Complainant                    : M/s G.Sai Kannan

Opposite party                                       : Party in person

 

          This complaint is coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :

 

Docket order

 

      No representation for both. This complaint is posted today for appearance of complainant and for appropriate orders or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M,  the complainant was not present  hence,  passed over and  called again at 12.30 noon, then also the complainant has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the complaint pending is of no use as the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case.   Hence the complaint is dismissed for default No order as to cost.

      Sd/-                                                                                                             Sd/-

  R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                R. SUBBIAH

               MEMBER                                                                                  PRESIDENT