Uttarakhand

StateCommission

MA/10/2019

Smt. Akshita Agarwal - Complainant(s)

Versus

Senior Branch Manager, Life Insurance Corporation Of India - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. William Akbar Chand

05 Jul 2022

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,UTTARAKHAND
23/16, Circular Road, Dalanwala, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248001
Dehradun-248001
Final Order
 
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/10/2019
( Date of Filing : 26 Aug 2019 )
In
 
1. Smt. Akshita Agarwal
w/o late Nitin Agrwal r/o at present ward No. 5000 Patti Chauhan, Jaspur,
Udham Singh Nagar
Uttarakhand
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Senior Branch Manager, Life Insurance Corporation Of India
branch office Awas Vikas Colony, Kashipur,
Udham Singh Nagar
Uttarakhand
2. Smt. Anju Agarwal
w/o late Suresh Kumar Agarwal r/o Bhona, Islamnagar, Nagarpatti, Vikrampur, Teh. Bajpur,
Udham Singh Nagar
Uttarakhand
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.S. Tripathi PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Udai Singh Tolia MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 05 Jul 2022
Final Order / Judgement

Case is called out.

None is present on behalf of the applicant.

Sh. William Akbar Chand, learned counsel for the applicant was present before the Commission on 01.04.2022.  On 09.05.2022, the case was adjourned on the basis of adjournment application moved on behalf of the applicant and the case was fixed for hearing on admission on 14.06.2022, but the applicant did not appear before the Commission on 14.06.2022 and following order was passed by this Commission:

“Case is called out.

None is present on behalf of the applicant.

In the interest of justice, one opportunity is provided to the applicant.

Put up on 05.07.2022 for hearing on admission.”

Perusal of record reveals that the consumer complaint has been filed by Smt. Akshita Agarwal W/o late Sh. Nitin Agarwal, while the life assured had nominated his mother Smt. Anju Agarwal, as nominee in the insurance policy, who has been impleaded as opposite party No. 2.

Accordingly, the applicant was required to make submissions as to how the applicant is entitled to file this consumer complaint and for this reason, the consumer complaint was registered as miscellaneous application.  However, none is appearing on behalf of the applicant for several dates.

It appears that the applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter further.

Accordingly, the miscellaneous application is dismissed in default of the applicant.

Let the record be consigned.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.S. Tripathi]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Udai Singh Tolia]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.