Kerala

Kannur

CC/178/2006

K sarada, Chekkikkattil House, Ponniam East, TLY - Complainant(s)

Versus

Secretary,Kadirur Service Co-Op Bank Ltd. , Kadirur - Opp.Party(s)

01 Nov 2008

ORDER


In The Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
Kannur
consumer case(CC) No. CC/178/2006

K sarada, Chekkikkattil House, Ponniam East, TLY
...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

Secretary,Kadirur Service Co-Op Bank Ltd. , Kadirur
MD Kerala State Co-op Consumer Federation Ltd.Gandhi Nagar,Cochin
...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:
1. GOPALAN.K 2. JESSY.M.D 3. PREETHAKUMARI.K.P

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

1.11.2008 Smt.M.D.Jessy, Member This is a complaint filed under section12 of the consumer protection Act for getting an order directing the opposite parties to refund Rs.5750/- with interest and cost. The case of the complainant in brief is as follows: - the opposite parties were jointly provided gas connection for domestic purposes. The opposite parties offered spot connection and regular supply of gas cylinders without any delay. When complainant approached 1st opposite party they assured that 2nd opposite party will provide gas connection on deposit of Rs.5750/- which will be refunded in the event of termination of the gas connection. Complainant paid Rs.5750/- and availed gas connection. But later on the supply of gas happened to b e irregular as against the assurance of the 1st opposite party. More over they supplied refilled gas cylinders were of substandard quality and quantity. Hence the complainant cancelled the gas connection and asked for refund of the amount. 1st opposite party was not ready to refund the amount and hence the complaint. After receiving the notice from the Forum 2nd opposite party filed version admitting that the complainant had availed gas connection by paying Rs.5750/- to the 1st opposite party. But the 1st opposite party was handed over the amount to 2nd opposite party. Out of which 2nd opposite party had given Rs.5500/- to Koldy Petroleum India Ltd., Rs.100/- to 1st opposite party and 2nd opposite party had appropriated Rs.150/- itself. They further admits that some delay was caused in supplying refilled gas cylinder which was caused not because of any default committed by 2nd opposite party but due to withdrawal of Koldy Petroleum, from supplying a gas and hence if any liability is found only Koldy Petroleum India Ltd. is liable. On the above pleadings the following issues were raised for consideration. 1. Whether there is any deficiency in-service on the part of the opposite parties 2. Whether the complainant is entitled for remedy as prayed in the complaint? 3. Relief and cost. The evidence consists of oral testimony of PW1 and Ext.A1 Issue Nos. 1 to 3 The complainant has stated in the complaint that she has availed gas connection from1st opposite party b paying an amount of Rs.57500/-. The complainant was assured that the amount would be refunded at the time when the equipments are surrendered. Ext.A1 is the surrendering certificate. Complainant stated that the opposite parties did not supply gas regularly. It is understoodable that if there is no supply of gas that creates much trouble to those consumers of gas users. When it was complained to 1st opposite party his explanation was that 2nd opposite party is responsible for those troubles. Ext.A1 shows that complainant had surrendered two cylinders and one regulator to 1st opposite party. Hence all the opposite parties are jointly and severally liable to refund Rs.5750/- to the complainant. Thus issues 1 to 3 are found in favour of the complainant. In the result, complaint is allowed directing the opposite parties to refund Rs.5750/-(Rupees Five thousand Seven hundred and fifty only) to the complainant within one month from the date of receipt of this order, failing which the complainant is allowed to execute the order against the opposite parties under the provisions of the consumer protection Act. Sd/- Sd/- Sd/- President Member Member APPENDIX Exhibits for the complainant A1.Certificate dt.4.9.08 issued by OP1 to complainant Exhibits for the opposite parties: Nil Witness examined for the complainant PW1.Complainant Witness examined for the opposite parties: Nil /forwarded by order/ Senior Superintendent Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kannur Despatched on




......................GOPALAN.K
......................JESSY.M.D
......................PREETHAKUMARI.K.P