PBEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, ERNAKULAM.

                       Dated this the 13^th day of December 2011

                                                                                 Filed on : 12/12/2011

Present :

          Shri. A  Rajesh,                                                     President.

Shri. Paul Gomez, Member.                                   Member.

Smt. C.K. Lekhamma,                                           Member

C.C. No. 687/2011

     Between

P.C. Kuttan,                                                 :        Complainant

F4/15, Satellite Township,                                 (party-in-person)

Kakkanadu Padinjaru P.O.,

Kochi-682 030.

                                                And

1. The Secretary,                                       :         Opposite parties

    Kerala State Housing Board,                         (notice not issued)

    Thiruvananthapuram.

2. Regional Engineer,

    Kerala State Housing Board,

    Regional Office, Panampilly Nagar,

    Kochi-36.

3. Executive Engineer,

    Kerala State Housing Board,

    Panampilly Nagar.

    Kochi-36.

                                          O R D E R

A  Rajesh, President.

                    This  complaint has been filed by the complainant seeking direction against  the opposite parties to execute sale deed pertaining to  a flat which had been handed over to him by the opposite parties as  per the order of the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala  in O.P. N. 556/87 dated 02-04-1987.

                2. We heard the complainant who appeared in person on admission of the complainant and went through the documents on record.  Admittedly at the instance of the complainant vide order in I.A. No. 1305/2009 in RFA No. 15/2009 dated 07-04-2009 the Hon’ble High Court  held as follows:

      “pending of the appeal will not stand in the way to execute     necessary sale deed, after obtaining the full consideration., if     not already obtained”.

                3.Again the Hon’ble High Court passed an order in WP (C) NO.    

      15299/2009 (F) dated 20-08-2009 which reads as follows:

      “In these circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of           directing the respondents to execute the sale deed in relation to     plot F4-15 of the Thrikkakkara housing accommodation scheme     and present if for registration before the Sub Registrar in the        presence of the petitioner on any day suitable to them within       one month from the date of receipt of the copy of this judgment.      The petitioner shall be present before be Sub Registrar when asked to do so in that regard.  But it is made clear that the       Housing Board is entitled to assert it is a claim for the amount of Rs. 8,200/- referred to Ext. P6, while defending RFA No.     15/2009.  Further the claim for amount of Rs. 8,200/- will   constitute  a charge over the property which is to be assigned in   favour of the petitioner, and shall remain so till the disposal of         RFA 15/09.  Thereafter it shall abide by the order that this Court       may pass in RFA 15/2009.  The Sub Registrar shall after        registration of the document, hand over the original title deed to    the petitioner in accordance with law”

      4. Evidently the Hon’ble High Court  was pleased to consider the very same relief sought for in this complaint against the opposite parties in the above referred cases.   We are not to sit in judgment of the very same issue in this complaint which is not called for legally.  Therefore this complaint is dismissed without admitting the same. 

        Pronounced in the open Forum on this the 13^th day of December 2011

 Sd/-  A  Rajesh, President.

                                                           Sd/-  Paul Gomez, Member.

                                                           Sd/-  C.K. Lekhamma, Member.