Haryana

Sonipat

CC/369/2017

Mahipal S/o Kishan Chand - Complainant(s)

Versus

SDO UHVBNL - Opp.Party(s)

Surender Malik

08 Jan 2018

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,SONEPAT.

 

                                       Complaint No.               :         369  of  2017

Instituted on                  :         05.09.2017

Date of order                :         08.01.2018

 

1. Mahipal S/o Shri kishan Chand, R/o Village Kasandi, Tehsil Gohana District Sonepat.

         …Complainants

Versus

1. S.D.O. UHBVNL, Gohana, Sonepat (Having Territorial jurisdiction of Village Kasandi).
2. XEN, UHBVNL, Gohana, District Sonepat.

                                       …Respondents.

 

COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT.

 

Present   : Shri Surender Malik Advocate for complainant.

           Shri Jagdeep Balyan, Adv. for respondent no.1 and 2.

ORDER

           Ld. Counsel for the complainant has made a statement that due to technical defects involved in the present complaint, he does not want to continue with the present complaint and thus, the present complaint may be dismissed as withdrawn and necessary permission it file the case before the appropriate court may kindly be accorded.

        Statement recorded separately.

        Heard.

        Keeping in view the statement made by the ld. Counsel for the complainant, the present complaint stands dismissed as withdrawn and necessary permission is granted to the complainant to file the case before the appropriate Court. Original documents, if any, be returned to the complainant after keeping photo copies of the same on the case file. Benefit of section 14(2) of Limitation Act is also given to the complainant.

        File be consigned after due compliance.

 

 

        (Prabhawati)             (Nagender Singh)

        Member                   President

        DCDRF, Sonepat           DCDRF, Sonepat

 

Announced : 08/01/2018