Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/18/312

Anoop Ananad - Complainant(s)

Versus

SBI Life Insurances - Opp.Party(s)

31 Mar 2023

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACADU THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

PRESENT

 

               SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN           : PRESIDENT

          SMT.PREETHA G NAIR     : MEMBER

           SRI.VIJU.V.R                       : MEMBER

CC.NO.312/2018 (Filed on : 31/08/2018)

ORDER DATED : 31/03/2023

COMPLAINANT

Anoop Anand,

S/o.Anandan Nair

Residing at 3 Bittern Close,

FY3 8FS, Blackpool

Lancashire, United Kingdom, Having residence at

TC.15/317, ‘Aksharam’, CSM Nagar, 251

Sasthamangalam.P.O, Thiruvananthapuram – 695010

(By Adv.D.Arun)

                                                          VS

OPPOSITE PARTIES

1. SBI Life Insurance Company Ltd,

Rep.by its Regional Director,

TC.15/183, Chennakara Building,

•  

Vazhuthacaud Road, Althara Junction,

2. Aneesh Nair,

Business Development Manager,

SBI Life Insurance Company Ltd,

Rep.by its Regional Director,

TC.15/183, Chennakara Building,

•  

Vazhuthacaud Road, Althara Junction,

 

3. Vidyavathy.T.S

Assistant Manager (Operations)

SBI Life Insurance Company Ltd,

TC.15/183, Chennakara Building,

•  

Vazhuthacaud Road, Althara Junction,

•  

Thiruvananthapuram – 695 010

          (By Adv.G.Unnikrishnan)

ORDER

 

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN      : PRESIDENT

 

1. This complaint filed under section 12 of Consumer Protection Act 1986 and stood over to this date for consideration and this Commission passed the following order.

2. This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties. After admitting the complaint notice was issued to the opposite parties. The opposite parties entered appearance and filed written version denying the allegations raised by the complainant. Since 20/12/2021 this case is adjourned for the purpose of filing affidavit of the complainant. Though the complainant was represented through counsel, the complainant failed to file affidavit. On 04/01/23 the complainant was represented through counsel and submitted that they intend to not press the complaint and sought time for filing a memo to that effect. Hence the case was adjourned to 22/02/2023 and 30/03/2023 for the memo of the complainant. On 30/03/2023 there is no representation for the complainant and not filed any memo also. In view of the above discussions, we find that the complainant is not interested to further proceed with this complaint. In view of the above discussions we find that this is a fit case to be dismissed.

                     In the result, the complaint is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs.

             A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

 

          Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Commission, this the 31^st day of March 2023.

 

 

                                                                                Sd/-

P.V.JAYARAJAN    : PRESIDENT

                                                                                         Sd/-

        PREETHA G NAIR      : MEMBER

                                                                                              Sd/-

VIJU.V.R    : MEMBER

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Be/