Haryana

Karnal

CC/21/2020

Naresh Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

SBI General Insurance Company Limited - Opp.Party(s)

R.K. Chauhaan

28 Jul 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                          Complaint.No.21 of 2020

                                                          Date of instt.10.01.2020

                                                          Date of Decision:28.07.2022

 

Naresh Kumar son of Sh. Duli Chand, resident of village Uplana tehsil Assandh, district Karnal.

…….Complainant

                                        Versus

1. SBI General Insurance Co.Ltd., SCO 388,389 1^st floor, DD International Karan Commercial complex old mugal canal, sector-13, Karnal-132001 through its manager.
2. SBI General Insurance Co.Ltd. Natraj, 301, junction of western express highway and andheri kurla, road, andheri (East) Mumbai-400069 through its authorized person/MD
3. The Deputy Director Agriculture Karnal, old Kachari complex near P.S. Women, Karnal

                                 …..Opposite parties.

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before      Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

                Smt. Dr. Rekha Chaudhary……..Member.

 

Present:  None for the complainant.

                Sh. Naveen Khetarpal, counsel for the OPs-1 & 2.

                Sh. Surender Kumar Project officer, on behalf of the OP-3.

 

                        Today the case is fixed for evidence of the complainant, subject to the third last opportunities. Neither anyone has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant nor any evidence is present. Case called several times since morning. It is already 04:00 PM. No further wait is justified. It appears that complainant is no more interested to pursue her case. Complainant has failed to conclude his evidence after availing the five effected opportunities. There is no justification to adjourn the case further for the same purpose, as complaint pertains to the year 2020.

                Hence, in view the above discussion, the present complaint is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. However, complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action in the court of competent jurisdiction, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Announced
Dated:28.07.2022             

                             President, 

District Consumer Disputes                                                    

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

 

(Vineet Kaushik)   (Dr. Rekha Chaudhary) 

  Member                Member