Delhi

Central Delhi

CC/129/2015

KABIR LOGISTICS - Complainant(s)

Versus

SBI GENERAL INS. CO. LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

06 Oct 2015

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/129/2015
 
1. KABIR LOGISTICS
A-2/26, JANAKPURI, B-1 JANAKPURI, WEST DELHI-58.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. SBI GENERAL INS. CO. LTD.
7B, RAJENDERA NAGAR PLACE METRO STN. PUSA ROAD DELHI 05.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. RAKESH KAPOOR PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. VIKRAM KUMAR DABAS MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. NIPUR CHANDNA MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

ORDER

V. K. DABAS, MEMBER

 

In United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. M.K.Corporation,III(1996)CPJ8(SC), the Hon’ble Supreme Court held as under:-

 

 

“It is a fundamental principle of Insurance Law that utmost good faith must be observed by the contracting parties. Good faith forbids either party from concealing (non disclosure) what he privately knows,to draw the other into a bargain, from his ignorance of that fact and his believing the contrary. Just as the insured has a duty to disclose, ”Similarly, it is the duty of the insurers and their agents to disclose all material facts within their knowledge since obligation of good faith applies to them equally with the assured.

The duty of good faith is a continuing nature. After the completion of the contract, no material alteration can be made in its terms except by mutual consent.

 

    In the case in hand, the facts are  that the complainant had purchased a policy of insurance in respect of a truck HR 55 M 7834 owned by it from the OP without disclosing that it had taken a claim of insurance from the previous insurer in the last year of the insurance policy.  It had , claimed no claim bonus @ 25% of the premium amount to which it was not entitled to. On coming to know about this fact , the OP insurance company had cancelled the policy.  In our considered opinion the cancellation of the policy was justified in the facts and circumstances of the case. The claim lodged by the complainant on account of the cost of repairs as the truck had met with an accident, was not payable and was rightly declined by the OP. We see no merits in this complaint. The same is hereby dismissed.

Copy of the order be made available to the parties as per rule.   File be consigned to record room.

     Announced in open sitting of the Forum on.....................

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. RAKESH KAPOOR]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. VIKRAM KUMAR DABAS]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MRS. NIPUR CHANDNA]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.