NCDRC

NCDRC

FA/1685/2017

LAKSHYA HEIGHTS - Complainant(s)

Versus

SAURABH KUMAR SINGH - Opp.Party(s)

MR. ANURAG SINGH

23 Oct 2017

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1683 OF 2017
 
(Against the Order dated 28/04/2017 in Complaint No. 69/2017 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)
1. LAKSHYA HEIGHTS
THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, SRI. SURESH CHANDRA AGARWAL. GH-01, POCKET-2, SECTOR-B, SUSHANT GOLF CITY.
LUCKNOW.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus 
1. DR. DESH BANDHU ARYA & ANR.
FLAT NO.206, ROYAL, BLOCK-II, ELDECO GREEN APARTMENT, GOMTI NAGAR.
LUCKNOW.
2. DR. SHEELA ARYA.
W/O. DR. DESH BANDHU ARYA. FLAT NO.206, ROYAL, BLOCK-II, ELDECO GREEN APARTMENT, GOMTI NAGAR.
LUCKNOW.
...........Respondent(s)
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1684 OF 2017
 
(Against the Order dated 28/04/2017 in Complaint No. 70/2017 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)
WITH
IA/14158/2017(Stay),IA/14159/2017(Condonation of delay),IA/14160/2017(Placing addl. documents),IA/15404/2017(Condonation of delay)
1. LAKSHYA HEIGHTS
THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY SRI. SURESH CHANDRA AGARWAL. GH-01, POCKET-2, SECTOR-B, SUSHANT GOLF CITY.
LUCKNOW.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus 
1. NAVNEET PANDEY & ANR.
S/O. SRI. JAI SHANKAR PANDEY. FLAT NO. 504, SHARDA APARTMENT, GOMTI NAGAR EXTENSION.
LUCKNOW.
2. MANEESH KUMAR PANDEY.
S/O. SRI. JAI SHANKAR PANDEY. FLAT NO.504, SHARDA APARTMENT, GOMTI NAGAR EXTENSION.`
LUCKNOW.
...........Respondent(s)
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1685 OF 2017
 
(Against the Order dated 28/04/2017 in Complaint No. 71/2017 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)
WITH
IA/14161/2017(Stay),IA/14162/2017(Condonation of delay),IA/14163/2017(Placing addl. documents),IA/15405/2017(Condonation of delay)
1. LAKSHYA HEIGHTS
THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY,SRI SURESH CHANDRA AGARWAL. GH-01, POCKET-2, SECTOR-B, SUSHANT GOLF CITY.
LUCKNOW.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus 
1. SAURABH KUMAR SINGH
S/O. LATE S.K. SINGH. 529K/1516, KHURRAMNAGAR, PANT NAGAR.
LUCKNOW.
...........Respondent(s)
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1686 OF 2017
 
(Against the Order dated 28/04/2017 in Complaint No. 72/2017 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)
WITH
IA/14164/2017(Stay),IA/14165/2017(Condonation of delay),IA/14166/2017(Placing addl. documents),IA/15406/2017(Condonation of delay)
1. LAKSHYA HEIGHTS
THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, SRI. SURESH CHANDRA AGARWAL. GH-01, POCKET-2, SECTOR-B, SUSHANT GOLF CITY.
LUCKNOW.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus 
1. MITHILESH SINGH
W/O. LATE RANA PRATAP SINGH. 326, SECTOR-J, AASHIYANA COLONY.
LUCKNOW-226012.
...........Respondent(s)
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1687 OF 2017
 
(Against the Order dated 28/04/2017 in Complaint No. 73/2017 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)
WITH
IA/14167/2017(Stay),IA/14168/2017(Condonation of delay),IA/14169/2017(Placing addl. documents),IA/15407/2017(Condonation of delay)
1. LAKSHYA HEIGHTS
THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, SRI. SURESH CHANDRA AGARWAL. GH-01, POCKET-2, SECTOR-B, SUSHANT GOLF CITY.
LUCKNOW.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus 
1. VISHAL KUDESIA & ANR.
B-1437, INDIRA NAGAR.
LUCKNOW
U.P.
2. SMT. SUMANIKA KUDESIA.
W/O. SRI. VISHAL KUDESIA. B-1437, INDIRA NAGAR.
LUCKNOW.
U.P.
...........Respondent(s)
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1688 OF 2017
 
(Against the Order dated 28/04/2017 in Complaint No. 75/2017 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)
WITH
IA/14170/2017(Stay),IA/14171/2017(Condonation of delay),IA/14172/2017(Placing addl. documents),IA/15408/2017(Condonation of delay)
1. LAKSHYA HEIGHTS
THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, SRI. SURESH CHANDRA AGARWAL. GH-01, POCKET-2, SECTOR-B, SUSHANT GOLF CITY.
LUCKNOW.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus 
1. ARVIND SINHA & ANR.
S/O. LATE. S.L. SINHA. 474/17/2, SITAPUR ROAD, NEAR MADEHGANJ POLICE CHOWKI, NEAR KHADRA.
LUCKNOW.
2. SMT. KRITI SINHA.
W/O. SRI. ARVIND SINHA. 474/17/2, SITAPUR ROAD, NEAR MADEHGANJ POLICE CHOWKI, NEAR KHADRA
LUCKNOW.
...........Respondent(s)
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1689 OF 2017
 
(Against the Order dated 28/04/2017 in Complaint No. 76/2017 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)
WITH
IA/14173/2017(Stay),IA/14174/2017(Condonation of delay),IA/14175/2017(Placing addl. documents),IA/15409/2017(Condonation of delay)
1. LAKSHYA HEIGHTS
THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY,SRI. SURESH CHANDRA AGARWAL. GH-01, POCKET-2, SECTOR-B., SUSHANT GOLF CITY.
LUCKNOW
U.P.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus 
1. VIKRANT SRIVASTAVA
S/O. LATE S.K. SRIVASTAVA. B-601, ROHTAS APARTMENTS, VIKAS NAGAR.
LUCKNOW
U.P.
...........Respondent(s)
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1690 OF 2017
 
(Against the Order dated 28/04/2017 in Complaint No. 77/2017 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)
WITH
IA/14176/2017(Stay),IA/14177/2017(Condonation of delay),IA/14178/2017(Placing addl. documents),IA/15410/2017(Condonation of delay)
1. LAKSHYA HEIGHTS
THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, SRI. SURESHCHANDRA AGARWAL. GH-01, POCKET-2, SECTOR-B, SUSHANT GOLF CITY.
LUCKNOW.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus 
1. MOHAN KUMAR TRIPATHI & ANR.
S/O. SRI. D.P. TRIPATHI.
LUCKNOW.
2. SMT. ALKA TRIPATHI.
W/O. SRI. MOHAN KUMAR TRIPATHI. FLAT NO.203, NIRALA IMPERIAL, PLOT NO.C/229, NIRALA NAGAR, NEAR CHARAN GUEST HOUSE.
LUCKNOW.
...........Respondent(s)
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1691 OF 2017
 
(Against the Order dated 28/04/2017 in Complaint No. 78/2017 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)
WITH
IA/14179/2017(Stay),IA/14180/2017(Condonation of delay),IA/14181/2017(Placing addl. documents),IA/15411/2017(Condonation of delay)
1. LAKSHYA HEIGHTS
THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, SRI. SURESH CHANDRA AGARWAL. GF-01, POCKET-2, SECTOR-B, SUSHANT GOLF CITY.
LUCKNOW.
U.P.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus 
1. DR. NARENDRA PRATAP SINGH
S.O. LATE. BANSHDHARI SINGH. S-24/143, C-1, TAKKAPUR,BEHIND MENTAL HOSPITAL.
VARANASI.
U.P.
...........Respondent(s)
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1692 OF 2017
 
(Against the Order dated 28/04/2017 in Complaint No. 79/2017 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)
WITH
IA/14182/2017(Stay),IA/14183/2017(Condonation of delay),IA/14184/2017(Placing addl. documents),IA/15412/2017(Condonation of delay)
1. LAKSHYA HEIGHTS
THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, SRI SURESH CHANDRA AGARWAL. GH-01, POCKET-2, SECTOR-B, SUSHANT GOLF CITY.
LUCKNOW.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus 
1. SHAKUNTALA TIWARI
540-D, TAN NAGAR, P.O. BARRA.
KANPUR.
...........Respondent(s)
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1693 OF 2017
 
(Against the Order dated 28/04/2017 in Complaint No. 80/2017 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)
WITH
IA/14185/2017(Stay),IA/14186/2017(Condonation of delay),IA/14187/2017(Placing addl. documents),IA/15413/2017(Condonation of delay)
1. LAKSHYA HEIGHTS
THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, SRI SURESH CHANDRA AGARWAL. GH-01, POCKET-2, SECTOR-B, SUSHANT GOLF CITY.
LUCKNOW.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus 
1. RAJIV KUMAR SINGH
S/O. SRI. RAJ KUMAR SINGH. B-203, PARADISE CRISTAL, SUSHANT GOLF CITY.
LUCKNOW.
...........Respondent(s)
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1694 OF 2017
 
(Against the Order dated 28/04/2017 in Complaint No. 81/2017 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)
WITH
IA/14188/2017(Stay),IA/14189/2017(Condonation of delay),IA/14190/2017(Placing addl. documents),IA/15414/2017(Condonation of delay)
1. LAKSHYA HEIGHTS
THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, SRI. SURESH CHANDRA AGARWAL. GH-01, POCKET-2, SECTOR-B, SUSHANT GOLF CITY.
LUCKNOW.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus 
1. ASAD ULLAH KHAN
S/O. MOHAMMAD. ABDULLAH KHAN. 300, KHAIRABAD, SULTANPUR.
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN,PRESIDENT

For the Appellant :
Mr. Anurag Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent :
Mr. Akhilesh, Advocate for
Mr. Vikas Aggarwal, Advocate

Dated : 23 Oct 2017
ORDER

Delay in filing of the Appeals is condoned.

At the outset, learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant in this bunch of 12 Appeals submits that the Appellant is willing to pay to the Complainants the interim compensation, as directed by the Fora below in the orders impugned in these Appeals, but it may be clarified that the Appellant will be entitled to account for the amount(s) so paid against the interest, which may be payable by each of the Complainants on account of the delay in deposit of the installments on time.     

        In view of the said statement on behalf of the Appellant, all the Appeals are dismissed, with the observation that if any amount towards interest is due from the Complainants in terms of the letters of allotment, which contain all the terms and conditions governing the allotment of the subject flats, the payment of any amount in terms of the impugned order shall have no bearing on the question of payment of overdue interest, which shall be decided at the time of final disposal of the Complaints. 

        It goes without saying that I have not expressed any opinion on the question of liability of the Complainants towards overdue interest, on account of the alleged delay on their part in making regular payment of the installments.

        All the Appeals stand disposed of in the above terms.

 

 
......................J
D.K. JAIN
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.