Kerala

StateCommission

A/15/93

force motors ltd - Complainant(s)

Versus

satyan - Opp.Party(s)

07 Feb 2020

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
 
First Appeal No. A/15/93
( Date of Filing : 03 Feb 2015 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 20/10/2014 in Case No. cc/150/2011 of District Palakkad)
 
1. force motors ltd
mumbai pune road,akurdi, pune
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. satyan
61/2, padinjarevalappil house, vilayur p.o, pattambi, palakkad
2. the managing partner m/s anugraha automobiles
coimbatore road, kalmandapam palakkad 678001
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.K.SURENDRA MOHAN PRESIDENT
  SRI.RANJIT.R MEMBER
  SMT.BEENAKUMARI.A MEMBER
  SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
Dated : 07 Feb 2020
Final Order / Judgement

THE KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACADU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

APPEAL  NO.  93/2015

ORDER DATED. 07/02/2020

 (Appeal filed against the order in c.c.no. 150/2011, CDRF, Palakkad )

PRESENT:                 

          HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. K.SURENDRA MOHAN: PRESIDENT

          SRI.RANJIT . R    : MEMBER

          SMT.BEENA KUMARI. A          :MEMBER

          SRI.K.R.RADHA KRISHNAN    : MEMBER

APPELLANT:

           Force Motors Limited, Mumbai-Pune road,

          Akurdi, Pune, Represented by it’s Manager,

          Mahesh Bose.

          (By Adv. Chirayinkil C.P. Bhadra kumar )

 

V/S

RESPONDENTS:

  1. Mr. Sathyan S/o Sivasankaran,

Residing at 61/2,  Padinjarevalappil house,

Vilayur P.O,  Pattambi, Palakkad.

(By Adv. Dhananjayan )

 

2.The Managing Partner, , M/s. Anugraha Automobiles,

Coimbatore road, Kalmandapam, Palakkad- 678 001.

 

ORDER

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. K.SURENDRA MOHAN: PRESIDENT

 

          This   appeal   filed in the year  2015 has been pending for the past five years.  Till today,   service of notice on the respondents   remain  incomplete.   The 2nd respondent  has not been  served.  The appellant  was taking time for   completing   service  on the 2nd respondent  through substituted  service  from   28-07-2017.  Despite grant of repeated chances, no steps have been  taken.  There has been no representation for the appellant  when the appeal is called in court also.  In spite of the above, we have been indulgent in adjourning  the case.    The case stands posted today for producing  paper publication of the 2nd respondent.    There is no representation for the appellant.  No  steps  have been taken.  No draft paper publication is  produced.  It is obvious  that the appellant  is no  longer  interested in prosecuting  this appeal.  This   appeal  is   therefore

 

 

dismissed for non prosecution. 

 

JUSTICE    K.SURENDRA MOHAN: PRESIDENT

 

                                                                   RANJIT . R    : MEMBER

         

BEENA KUMARI. A          :MEMBER

 

                                              K.R.RADHA KRISHNAN    : MEMBER

   

 

 

 

 

Sh/-

         

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.K.SURENDRA MOHAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ SRI.RANJIT.R]
MEMBER
 
 
[ SMT.BEENAKUMARI.A]
MEMBER
 
 
[ SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.