BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM: MEDAK AT SANGAREDDY
PRESENT: SRI P.V.SUBRAHMANYAM, B.A,B.L., PRESIDENT.
SMT U.SUNITA, M.A., LADY MEMBER.
SRI MEKALA NARSIMHAREDDY, M.A,LL.B.,P.G.D.C.P.L
MALE MEMBER.
Tuesday, the 7th day of April, 2009
I.A. No. 13 of 2009
In
C.C. No. 3 of 2009
Between:
Satyanarayana Soni S/o Suraj Karan Soni,
Aged: 80 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No. 15-2-148,
Maharaj Gunj, Hyderabad. … Petitioner/Opp. party.
And
A.R. Siddappa S/o Veerappa,
Aged:Major, Occ: Service,
R/o Flat No. 214, Second Floor,
Chandra Towers, Rajampet,
Sangareddy town, medak district. … Respondent/Complainant
Counsel for the petitioner/opposite party :M/s Gopi Rajesh & Associates
Counsel for the Respondent /Complainant: Sri. P. Rama Rao.
O R D E R
( Per Sri. P.V. Subrahmanyam, President)
Upon consideration the following order is passed. According to the petitioner (opposite party), because he resides in Hyderabad, this forum has no territorial jurisdiction as per section 11 CP Act and hence the said issue may be decided as a preliminary issue. But according to the other side the complaint is in connection with deficiency in service in respect of a flat purchased by the respondent/ complainant from the petitioner/opposite party which is situated in Sangareddy, therefore this forum has jurisdiction to entertain the complaint and therefore the petition is not maintainable.
As this forum has to decide matters in a summary procedure, deciding of preliminary issues does not arise. Both parties are directed to get on with the main case for disposal.
With the above observation this petition is dismissed.
Typed to dictation, corrected and pronounced by us in the open forum this the 7th day of April, 2009.
Sd/- *** ***
President Lady Member Male Member
Copy to:
4) The petitioner/Opp. Party
5) The Respondent/complainant
6) Spare copy copy delivered to the Petitioner/Opp.Party/Respondent/
Complainant on __________
Dis.No. /2009, dt.
