Haryana

Karnal

CC/371/2024

Ms. Meena Jain - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sarthak Financial Solutions - Opp.Party(s)

Balwan Singh

05 Aug 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                                    Complaint No.371 of 2024

                                                                     Date of instt.24.07.2024

                                                                     Date of Decision:05.08.2024

 

Ms. Meenu Jain wife of Sh. Gaurav Jain R/o House No.626, Sector-13, extn., Urban Estate, Karnal, through authorized person Sh. Sushil Jain son of Sh. Tara Chand Jain being her father-in-Law resident of House No.626, Sector-13 extn., Urban Estate Karnal.

                                                                                      …….Complainant

                                                Versus

1. Sarthak Financial Solution, having its registered office at 415, 1^st floor, School Block, Mandawali New Delhi-110092 and its branch office at 246/67 east school block, Mandawali, Delhi-110092(hereinafter called SFS for the sake of brevity) assigned other part as per agreement, represented by Mr. Manoj Kumar son of Sh. Hari Om Gupta and Aakash Jain, partners.
2. : Branch office at 246/67, East School Blcok, Mandawali, Delhi-110092.

                                                                                       …..Opposite party.

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before       Sh. Jaswant Singh………President.   

                   Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

                   Smt. Sarvjeet Kaur…….  Member.

 

Present: Sh. Balwan Singh Dhounchak, Counsel for the Complainant.

                                           

       Today the case is fixed for consideration on the point of admissibility.              Learned counsel for the complainant has suffered his separate statement to effect that he does not want to pursue with the present complaint at this stage and withdraws the same on technical ground and sought permission to file the fresh complaint on the same cause of action before the competent Court of law.             

 In view of the above statement, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action before the competent Court of law, if so desired. The original documents annexed with the complaint, if any, be returned to the complainant by placing on record photocopies of the same. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Dated: 05.08.2024.               

                         President,      

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

(Vineet Kaushik)           (Sarvjeet Kaur)

    Member                        Member