MADAN SEHGAL filed a consumer case on 22 Sep 2016 against SAROJ BATRA in the StateCommission Consumer Court. The case no is RP/60/2016 and the judgment uploaded on 10 Nov 2016.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA
Revision Petition No: 60 of 2016
Date of Institution: 13.07.2016
Date of Decision : 22.09.2016
1. Madan Sehgal, Founder and Honorary Secretary, Haryana Bank Staff Co-operative Urban (Salary Earners) Non Agriculture Thrift & Credit Society Limited, Railway Road, near Bata Showroom, Rohtak, Resident of House No.105, Sector-1, Rohtak.
2. Sunil Sehgal s/o Sh. Madan Sehgal, Manager, Haryana Bank Staff Co-operative Urban (Salary Earners) Non Agriculture Thrift & Credit Society Limited, Railway Road, near Bata Showroom, Rohtak Resident of House No.150, Sector-1, Rohtak.
Petitioners-Opposite Parties No.3 & 4
Versus
1. Saroj Batra w/o Sh. Yashpal Batra, Resident of Gujra Mohalla, Rohtak.
Respondent-Complainant
2. The Haryana Bank Staff Co-operative Urban (Salary Earners) Non Agriculture Thrift & Credit Society Limited, Railway Road near Bata Showroom, Rohtak through its President Ved Parkash.
3. Ved Parkash, President, The Haryana Bank Staff Co-operative Urban (Salary Earners) Non Agriculture Thrift & Credit Society Limited, Railway Road near Bata Showroom, Rohtak.
4. Parveen Kumar Jain, Vice President, The Haryana Bank Staff Co-operative Urban (Salary Earners) Non Agriculture Thrift & Credit Society Limited, Railway Road near Bata Showroom, Rohtak.
Respondents-Opposite Parties No.1,2&5
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Nawab Singh, President.
Shri B.M. Bedi, Judicial Member.
Shri Diwan Singh Chauhan, Member
Present: Shri Manoj Makkar, Advocate for petitioners.
Mrs. Saroj Batra-respondent No.1 in person.
Respondents No.2 to 4 –Performa.
O R D E R
NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL)
The Haryana Bank Staff Co-operative Urban (Salary Earners) Non Agriculture Thrift & Credit Society Limited-Opposite Party No.1 (respondent No.1 herein), is a registered society. The petitioners-opposite parties No.3 & 4 and opposite parties No.2 and 5 (respondents No.3 and 4 herein), are the office bearers of the opposite party No.1.
2. Saroj Batra-complainant/respondent No.1, deposited amounts of Rs.17,898/- and Rs.30,868/- with the opposite parties, vide three FDRs No.16293 and 10348 respectively. After the maturity dates, the complainant approached the opposite parties to pay the maturity amount of FDRs but they did not pay the amount. Hence, complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 was filed before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Rohtak (for short ‘the District Forum’).
3. During the hearing of complaint, the opposite parties No.3 and 4-petitioners, filed an application seeking direction to the complainant to collect the amount of FDRs from the office of Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Rohtak (for short “A.R. Co. Operative Societies”).
4. The District Forum vide order dated May 31st, 2016 dismissed the application. Hence, the instant revision petition.
5. The solitary contention raised by the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the amounts of FDRs of the complainant as well as of other depositors, have been deposited with the A.R. Co. Operative Societies and therefore the complainant can collect the amount of her FDRs from them.
6. The contention raised is not tenable. Neither the A.R. Co. Operative Societies is a party to the complaint nor the amount has been deposited by the opposite parties against the FDRs of complainant with A.R. Co. Operative Societies. That amount pertains to deposit pursuance to order of A.R. Co. Operative Societies, qua embezzlement of Society funds/assets.
7. In view of the above, the impugned order does not call for any interference. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed.
Announced 22.09.2016 | Diwan Singh Chauhan Member | B.M. Bedi Judicial Member | Nawab Singh President |
CL
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.