Haryana

Yamunanagar

CC/232/2017

Parveen Kumar S/o Puran Chand - Complainant(s)

Versus

SARF Trading - Opp.Party(s)

Pankaj Chaudhary

09 Jan 2019

ORDER

CC No.232 of 2017.

Parveen Kumar vs. SARF.

 

Present:    None for complainant.

                 Respondents ex parte.

                               

                This complaint has been called several times since morning but the complainant has failed to appear before this Forum either in person or through his Advocate up to 3:45PM.  Further wait is unjustified. The complaint is dismissed on account of default in appearance by the complainant. However, the complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action subjection to the period of limitation.  File be consigned to the records.

                     

                L.Member          Member.                    President,

                                                                             9.1.2019.

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.