NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/896/2008

PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PUDA NOW GMADA & ANR - Complainant(s)

Versus

SARDARA SINGH - Opp.Party(s)

MRS. C.K. SUCHARITA

23 Sep 2008

ORDER

Date of Filing: 25 Feb 2008

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/896/2008
(Against the Order dated 11/07/2007 in Appeal No. 1217/2001 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PUDA NOW GMADA & ANR THROUGH ITS ADMINISTRATOR, MOHALI, PUNJAB ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. SARDARA SINGH RESIDENT OF 1325, GURU TEG BAHADUR SOCIETY, SECTOR 70, SAS NAGAR, MOHALI, PUNJAB ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.B. SHAH ,PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. RAJYALAKSHMI RAO ,MEMBER
For the Appellant :MRS. C.K. SUCHARITA
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 23 Sep 2008
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

            As the matter was decided on merits, the observation made in the impugned order does not call for any review.

            Hence, this misc. application is rejected.



......................JM.B. SHAHPRESIDENT
......................RAJYALAKSHMI RAOMEMBER