Sanyo And Sanyo. V/S Shri.Thomas Arul - Consumer Court Case

Goa

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,SOUTH GOA

MARGAO-GOA

Complaint Case No. CC/10/17

1. Shri.Thomas Arul

Flat No S-3, Second Floor, Classic Building, Pixem Dongri, Vasco-Da-Gama-Goa

BEFORE:
	HON'BLE MR. Jayant Prabhu PRESIDENT
	HON'BLE MS. Savita G. Kurtarkar MEMBER
	HON'BLE MRS. Cynthia Colaco MEMBER

For the Complainant:

Adv. S.Naik holding for Adv.A.Shetye

For the Opp. Party:

ORDER

The Opposite Parties have not been paid by the Complainant. Therefore the Complainant is not a consumer.

In view of above discussion we find no merits in the complaint and therefore we dismiss the complaint.

The complaint is dismissed with no orders as to cost.

[HON'BLE MR. Jayant Prabhu]

PRESIDENT

[HON'BLE MS. Savita G. Kurtarkar]

MEMBER

[HON'BLE MRS. Cynthia Colaco]

MEMBER

Featured Recomended

Featured Recomended

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.