NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/2143/2008

DIVISIONAL ENGINEER ADMIN - Complainant(s)

Versus

SANTOSH KUMAR - Opp.Party(s)

MR. PRADEEP KUMAR MATHUR

02 Jul 2008

ORDER

Date of Filing: 14 May 2008

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI.Revision Petition(RP) No. RP/08/2143
(Against the Order dated 06/02/2008 in Appeal No. 377/2007 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)
1. DIVISIONAL ENGINEER ADMIN MICROWAVE BUILDING NEAR KASHI TALAB SADAR BETUL MADHYA PRADESH ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. SANTOSH KUMAR R/O KOTHI BAZAR BETUL MADHYA PRADESH ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HONORABLE MR. JUSTICE S.N. KAPOOR ,PRESIDING MEMBER
For the Appellant :MR. PRADEEP KUMAR MATHUR
For the Respondent :

Dated : 02 Jul 2008
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

          Heard.  The dispute relates to a bill for a sum of Rs.1,298/- dated 1st October, 1999.  22 bills were issued after this alleged bill.  None of those bills included the amount of Rs.1,298/- earlier telephone connection was disconnected temporarily on                        17th November, 1999.  Ld. counsel for the petitioner submits that the complainant never sought restoration of the telephone connection.  It was permanently disconnected on 1st June, 2003.  On 1st June, 2003 the amount relating to bill dated 1st October, 1999 was barred by time.  No notice was given.  It was submitted by the Ld. counsel for the petitioner that orally, it was informed.   Ld. counsel for the

2//

petitioner was candid enough to submit that no affidavit of any person has been filed on record in support of this submission.

          In the aforesaid circumstances, there is no force in this revision petition.

          The revision petition is dismissed accordingly.

 



......................JS.N. KAPOORPRESIDING MEMBER