Karnataka

StateCommission

A/431/2021

Gulburga Electricity Supply Company Ltd. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sanjukumar - Opp.Party(s)

Prashanth.T.Pandit

17 Feb 2022

ORDER

KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
BASAVA BHAVAN, BANGALORE.
 
First Appeal No. A/431/2021
( Date of Filing : 26 Apr 2021 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/09/2020 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/21/2019 of District Bidar)
 
1. Gulburga Electricity Supply Company Ltd.
Rep by its Executive Engineer, Bidar-585401
Bidar
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Sanjukumar
S/o Prabhurao Kharatmul, Age 34 years, Aurad-S Tq and District Bidar
Bidar
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Huluvadi G. Ramesh PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Krishnamurthy B.Sangannavar JUDICIAL MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Divyashree.M MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 17 Feb 2022
Final Order / Judgement

A-431/2021

Krishnamurthy B.Sangannavar, JUDICIAL MEMBER

1.      This is an Appeal filed u/s 15 of C.P Act, 1986, aggrieved by the order passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bidar in CC-21/2019 on 03.09.2020.

2.      Learned counsel for appellant would submit that, Commission below in paragraph-12 at Page-6 held; Ex.P.5 is a relevant document and for the year 2018-19 the Sugar Cane Crop grown is only to the extent of 2 acres.  According to complainant he owns 5 acres of land although he alleged that, he has grown the sugarcane crop in 3 acres, but the Commission below rightly held that, his case is falsify since it has come in the enquiry that he has grown ToorDall crop in 1 acre and Soybean crop in another 2 acres and this has to be considered along with police papers and in consideration of the assessment made as to the loss of sugar cane crop by the Commission below with an intention to award some compensation to protect the consumer.  In our view, it would be appropriate to reduce the compensation from Rs.1,75,000/- to Rs.1,00,000/-, which would meet the ends of justice and to reduce interest from 8% to 6%, since, the rate of interest in the recent past is drastically reduced by Bankers. 

3.   In the above such conclusion by dispense with issuance of notice on respondent to avoid delay, we proceed to allow the appeal in part and directed OP/appellant to pay Rs.1,00,000/- along with interest @ 6% p.a from the date of complaint till realization and do pay Rs.10,000/- towards mental agony and Rs.5,000/- towards litigation costs.  Accordingly, appeal stands disposed off.

4.      Amount in deposit is directed to be transferred to the Commission below for needful.

5.      Send a copy of this Order to the District Commission and parties to the appeal.

 

        Lady Member                            Judicial Member

*J*   

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Huluvadi G. Ramesh]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Krishnamurthy B.Sangannavar]
JUDICIAL MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Divyashree.M]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.