West Bengal

Rajarhat

CC/366/2020

Biranchi Prasad Maharana,S/O-Narayan Moharana - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sanjib Kumar De, S/o, Shyamal Kumar Dey - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Arijit Das

26 Jun 2023

ORDER

Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajarhat (New Town )
Kreta Suraksha Bhavan,Rajarhat(New Town),2nd Floor
Premises No. 38-0775, Plot No. AA-IID-31-3, New Town,P.S.-Eco Park,Kolkata - 700161
 
Complaint Case No. CC/366/2020
( Date of Filing : 09 Dec 2020 )
 
1. Biranchi Prasad Maharana,S/O-Narayan Moharana
Residing at GR-FR, FL- 1B, 91/2, S.k. Deb road, LP 25/12/1/1/1, Kolkata-700048, P.S- Lake Town.
2. Archana Moharana (Mondal),W/O-Biranchi Prasad Maharana
Residing at GR-FR, FL- 1B, 91/2, S.k. Deb road, LP 25/12/1/1/1, Kolkata-700048, P.S- Lake Town.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Sanjib Kumar De, S/o, Shyamal Kumar Dey
Residing at 43/1, Swamiji Nagar (Bahiragata Colony) P.S- Dum Dum Kolkata-700030, Dist- North 24 Parganas.
2. Biswadeep Saha, S/o- Nilratan Saha
Residing at 28/F Swamiji Nagar P.S- Dum Dum Kolkata-700030, Dist- North 24 Parganas.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Shri Sankar Kumar Ghosh PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Gurudas Guin MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 26 Jun 2023
Final Order / Judgement

Complainants’ case in short is that O.P. no.1 and O.P. no.2 are the partners of M/s Maa Tara Construction, a partnership firm having its registered office at 28/F, Swamiji Nagar(Bahiragata Colony) P.S.-Dumdum, Kolkata-700030.

That O.Ps. have taken a land more fully described in paragraph no.3 of the petition of complaint from Aarati Roy and Balaram Chandra Roy for a joint venture development.

Thereafter the owners of land in question had also executed one general power of attorney in favour of O.Ps. regarding land and it was duly registered.

Complainants were also looking for flat for their residential purpose and knowing about such development they contacted O.Ps. and it was agreed that complainants to buy one flat of the proposed building measuring about 530sq.ft. on the first floor back portion with a settled price of Rs. 1,890/- per sq.ft. Thereafter complainants paid Rs.2,50,000/only as advance to the O.Ps. and in this regard one agreement was made and executed by and between the complainants and the O.Ps. Complainants allege that O.Ps. have accepted the advance amount and promised to hand over the said flat within time but have failed to do so.

Being dissatisfied with the service provided by the O.Ps. and also due to unfair trade practice on the part of O.Ps. complainants have instituted the present case against the O.Ps. with following prayers:

  1. Direction be given upon the O.Ps. to return back the amount of Rs.2, 50,000/-only to the complainant along with interest @12% p.a.
  2. Direction be given upon the O.Ps. to pay compensation amount of Rs.5, 00,000/-only for causing physical and mental harassment.
  3. Direction be given upon the O.Ps. to pay cost of litigation of Rs.50, 000/- only to the complainants.

As O.Ps. did not contest the case the instant case has proceeded ex parte hearing against O.Ps.

                                            POINTS FOR DECISION

Are the complainants entitled to get relief/reliefs as prayed for?

                                          DECISION WITH REASONS

To prove their case both the complainants have tendered their written examination in chief respectively supported by evidence on affidavit and they have also filed photocopies of relevant documents in support of their case.

We have gone through the evidence of the complainants and the documents filed by them.

It appears that in their evidence the complainant have fully corroborated their case as depicted in the petition of complaint and the photocopies of documents filed by them also lend support to the case of complainants. So, in view of the said evidence of the complainants and the photocopies of documents filed by them, remaining unchallenged, it is held that complainants have succeeded in proving the case and they are entitled to get reliefs as prayed for.

Hence, it is,

                                                          ORDERED

That the instant case CC/366/2020 be and the same is allowed ex parte against O.P. no. 1 and O.P. no.2 with costs.

O.Ps. are directed to pay/return back of Rs.2, 50,000/- only to the complainants with interest @8%p.a. with effect from 28.12.2020 till realization of full amount and the entire amount should be paid by the O.Ps. within 2 months from the date of this order.

O.Ps. are also directed to pay compensation amounting to Rs.50, 000/-only to the complainants for causing physical and mental harassment within 2 months from the date of this order.

O.Ps. are also directed to pay to the complainants Rs.10, 000/-towards litigation cost within 2 months from this date of this order.

Let plain copy of this order be supplied to the parties free of cost.

Dictated and Corrected by

[HON'BLE MR. Shri Sankar Kumar Ghosh]
PRESIDENT

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Shri Sankar Kumar Ghosh]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Gurudas Guin]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.