Chandigarh

DF-I

CP/176/2009

Surinder Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sanjeev Walia, S/o Sh. M.L. Walia - Opp.Party(s)

05 Mar 2010

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM - I Plot No 5- B, Sector 19 B, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh - 160 019
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 176 of 2009
1. Surinder KumarHouse no. 418/1, Sector-41/A Cahndigarh ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Sanjeev Walia, S/o Sh. M.L. WaliaMr sanjeev Walia son of Late Sh. M.L.Walia Incharge/ Director I Land Internet Land R/o House No. 458 SEctor-16 Panchkula, 2nd Address: C/oM/.s Jetage Computer SCO No.-12 First Floor SEctor-17/E Chandigarh ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 05 Mar 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HELD IN DISTRICT FORUM-I, U.T.

CHANDIGARH

                                                          Criminal Complaint No. 176 of 2009

in

Complaint Case No. 580 of 2005

 

1.   Surinder Kumar   

2.   Mahesh K.Verma

3.   Narain Singh

4.   U.S.Rangnekar      –   Complainants/DHs

 

              Versus

 

Mr.Sanjeev Walia        –    Opposite Party (OP)

 

Present:  Sh.Sandeep Bhardwaj, Advocate for Complainants/DHs alongwith complainants.

                       

Dated, the 5th day of March, 2010.

                        ORDER

 

1.        The case was taken up in the Lok Adalat. Sh.Sandeep Bhardwaj, Advocate for Complainants/DHs alongwith complainants has appeared and made statement for withdrawal of the execution applicaton, which is reproduced as under:-

“Statement of Sh.Sandeep Bhardwaj, Advocate for complainants/decree holders along with complainants.

 

The complainants have received settlement amounts from OP towards their full & final satisfaction and therefore, they do not want to pursue this execution application further.  Affidavits of complainants in this respect are being enclosed.  So, the execution application may kindly be dismissed as withdrawn being fully satisfied.” 

 

2.        In view of the statement given by counsel alongwith complainants, this execution application is dismissed as withdrawn.

3.        Copies of this order free of cost be supplied to the parties. The file be consigned.

 

                                      PRESIDING OFFICER

     LOK ADALAT.

 

 

 

3rd MEMBER          2nd MEMBER          1st MEMBER

 


RAJINDER SINGH GILL, MEMBERHONABLE MR. JAGROOP SINGH MAHAL, PRESIDENT DR. MADHU BEHL, MEMBER