NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/2209/2010

M/S. JINDAL PIPES LTD & ORS. - Complainant(s)

Versus

SANJEEV SHARMA - Opp.Party(s)

MR. ADITIYA KUMAR CHOUDHARY

30 Jun 2010

ORDER


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2209 OF 2010
(Against the Order dated 19/04/2010 in Appeal No. 134/2010 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh)
1. M/S. JINDAL PIPES LTD & ORS.Through its Chairman-Cum Managing Director, Corporate Office, Plot No. 30, Institutional Area Sector No. 44GurgaonHaryana2. M/S. MAHARASHTRA SEAMLESS LTD. NEGOTHANThrough its Chairman-Cum-Managing Director, Corporate Office- Plot No. 30, Institutional Area, Sector No. 44GurgaonHaryana3. SHRI H.K. KHANNA, DIRECTOR MARKETINGM/s. Jindal Pipes Ltd. Corporate Office, Plot No. 30, Institutional Area Sector No. 44GurgaonHaryana4. SHRI J. SOOD. GENERAL MANAGER (MARKETING)M/s. Jindal Pipes Ltd. Corporate Office, Plot No. 30, Institutional Area Sector No. 44GurgaonHaryana ...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. SANJEEV SHARMAPartner of M/s. Khaitani Construction, Anu, HamirpurHamirpurHimachal Pradesh ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. GUPTA ,PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. BATTA ,MEMBERHON'BLE MR. VINAY KUMAR ,MEMBER
For the Petitioner :MR. ADITIYA KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 30 Jun 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Order dated 22.2.2010 of the District Forum is for refund of the enhanced rate amount with interest by the petitioners/opposite parties to the respondent/complainant. Vide impugned order passed in appeal filed by the petitioners the operation of the said order of District Forum has been stayed subject to deposit of the entire awarded amount by the State Commission. Sri Choudhary contends that the State Commission was not justified in ordering deposit of the entire awarded amount as a condition for stay of the Forum’s order. Having considered the orders passed by the District Forum, we are not inclined to interfere with the direction issued by the State Commission in staying operation of the order of District Forum subject to -3- deposit of the entire awarded amount with interest. Revision petition is dismissed as being without any merit.



......................JK.S. GUPTAPRESIDING MEMBER
......................JR.K. BATTAMEMBER
......................VINAY KUMARMEMBER