Orissa

Bargarh

CC/15/20

Sri Basanta Kumar Debta - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sanjay Sales - Opp.Party(s)

R.V. Pati

19 Sep 2016

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/15/20
 
1. Sri Basanta Kumar Debta
resident of and P.O. Ghess, P.S. Sohela, Dist. Bargarh
Bargarh
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Sanjay Sales
At/P.O. Gousala Complex, Gandhi Chowk, Bargarh, P.S. And Dist. Bargarh.
Bargarh
Odisha
2. The general Manager
At/P.O. 14Kms. Stone Aurangabad, Paithan Road, Chitegaon, TQ, Paithan, District- Aurangbad, C/o. Narendra Kumar Sahu Branch Head Manager Tekcare India Private Ltd. Plot No. 1958/4083 Near Chintamanis
Cuttack
Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sri. Krishna Prasad Mishra PRESIDENT
 HONORABLE Sri Pradeep Kumar Dash Member
 
For the Complainant:R.V. Pati, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 19 Sep 2016
Final Order / Judgement

Date of filing:- 23/03/2016.

Date of Order:-19/09/2016.

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FOURM (COURT)

B A R G A R H.

Consumer Complaint No. 20 of 2015

Sri Basanta Kumar Debata son of Late Muralidhar Debata, aged about 56(fifty six) years, resident of and P.o. Ghess, P.s. Sohela, Dist. Bargarh.

..... ..... ..... Complainant.

-V e r s u s -

  1. The Proprietor, Sanjay Sales, At/Po. Goushala Complex, Gandhi Chowk, Bargarh, Ps and Dist. Bargarh.

  2. The General Manager, Videocon Industries Ltd., At/Po. 14kms Stone Aurangabad, Painthan Road, Chitegaon, TQ, Dist. Aurangabad C/o Nagendra Kumar Sahu, Branch Head Manager, Tekcare India Private Ltd., Plot No. 1958/4083 Near Chintamaniswar Temple, Cuttack Road, Bhubaneswar Pin-751006.

    ..... ..... ..... Opposite Parties.

    ORDER PASSED BY THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM(COURT) BARGARH ON DT.19/09/2016.

    Dt.19/09/2016.

    Today the case was posted for hearing. But in the mean time both the Complainant and OP has settled their dispute on Dt.09/09/2016 and in the above context, to-day the Complainant has filed a memo stating therein that the T.V. In question in the case is already replaced with a new one and he has received the same and as such he does not want to proceed with the case further.

    In view of such above stated circumstance, the memo filed by the Complainant is allowed and accordingly the case is disposed off.

    Sd/- Sd/-

    (Sri Pradeep Kumar Dash) (Sri Krishna Prasad Mishra)

    M e m b e r. P r e s i d e n t.

     
     
    [HON'BLE MR. Sri. Krishna Prasad Mishra]
    PRESIDENT
     
    [HONORABLE Sri Pradeep Kumar Dash]
    Member

    Consumer Court Lawyer

    Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

    Bhanu Pratap

    Featured Recomended
    Highly recommended!
    5.0 (615)

    Bhanu Pratap

    Featured Recomended
    Highly recommended!

    Experties

    Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

    Phone Number

    7982270319

    Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.