Uttarakhand

StateCommission

A/13/242

Hero Honda Motors Ltd. another - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sanjay Paliwal - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Abhishek Prabhakar

02 Feb 2024

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,UTTARAKHAND
23/16, Circular Road, Dalanwala, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248001
Dehradun-248001
Final Order
 
First Appeal No. A/13/242
( Date of Filing : 29 Aug 2013 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 31/10/1994 in Case No. 66/1993 of District Haridwar)
 
1. Hero Honda Motors Ltd. another
34 Basant Lok,Vasant Vihar,New Delhi
New Delhi
New Delhi
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Sanjay Paliwal
s/o N.K. Paliwal r/o Batala Ashram,Kankhal
Haridwqr
Uttarakhand
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MS. Kumkum Rani PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. B. S. Manral MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Sh. Abhishek Prabhakar, Advocate for the Appellant 1
 
Dated : 02 Feb 2024
Final Order / Judgement

Learned counsel Sh. Abhishek Prabhakar for the appellant has appeared. 

Respondent - complainant has not appearing before this Commission since a long time.

Service upon respondent is considered as being sufficient.

Today none has appeared on behalf of the respondent - complainant inspite of several calls.

The appeal is being heard ex-parte against the respondent - complainant.

Learned counsel for the appellant has stated that the matter in dispute has already been resolved amicably between the appellant and respondent - complainant and the vehicle in question has been repaired. Now there is no question to have arisen to replace the new vehicle in place of old vehicle.

We have perused the application (paper No. 41) moved on dated 11.03.1999 by the respondent, wherein respondent - complainant has stated that his vehicle has been repaired, hence he do not want to get further the impugned judgment impleaded.

We have heard learned counsel for the appellant.

As the old vehicle has already been repaired during the pendency of the appeal, hence the impugned judgment in regard to replace the old vehicle with new one cannot be said to be executable as per the application of the respondent - complainant.

A the technical and mechanical defects have already been removed as per satisfaction of the respondent as mentioned in the application (paper No. 41), hence in such circumstances, the impugned judgment is not executable and is liable to be set aside,.

It is also pertinent to mention that the matter has already been resolved between the parties in different way, therefore, the impugned judgment is hereby set aside.

The matter has amicably resolved between the parties out of the Commission and the appeal has become infructuous, therefore, the appeal is hereby dismissed as being infructuous. No order as to costs.

File be consigned to the record room alongwith copy of this order.

A copy of this order alongwith original record of the District Commission be sent to the concerned District Commission for perusal, information and necessary action.

 
 
[HON'BLE MS. Kumkum Rani]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. B. S. Manral]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.