Delhi

StateCommission

A/744/2014

M/S COUNTRY CLUB INDIA LTD. - Complainant(s)

Versus

SANDHYA TEKCHANDANI - Opp.Party(s)

21 Aug 2014

ORDER

IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHI
Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
 
First Appeal No. A/744/2014
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. CC/730/2013 of District West Delhi)
 
1. M/S COUNTRY CLUB INDIA LTD.
CITI SQUARE MALL 2nd FLOOR RAJOURI GARDEN
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SANDHYA TEKCHANDANI
R/O A-37, SHANKAR GARDEN, NEAR VIKASEPURI, N.D.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE N.P KAUSHIK MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
ORDER

 

                                                                                                                 Date of Decision: 21.08.2014

                                    

First Appeal – 744/2014

 

M/s. Country Club India Ltd.,

Citi Square Mall,

2nd Floor,

Rajouri Garden

 

Country Club (head office),

25, Community Centre,

East of Kailash,

New Delhi.

 

………Appellant

Vs

Sandhya Tekchandani,

W/o Shri Dheeraj Tekchandani,

R/o A-37, Shankar Garden,

Near Vikaspuri,

New Delhi-18.

                                                ……..Respondent

 

 

CORAM

 

Salma Noor, Presiding Member

NP Kaushik, Member(Judicial)

 

1.   Whether reporters of local newspaper be allowed to see the judgment? 

2.   To be referred to the reporter or not?

 

 

SALMA NOOR, PRESIDING MEMBER

 

1.     In a complaint case bearing No.730/2013 Sandhya Tekchandani vs M/s. Country Club India Ltd. filed before District Forum-III, New Delhi 1.7.2014 was fixed for filing evidence by the OP/Appellant, but due to non-appearance, the Forum proceeded ex-parte. 

 

 

 

 

2.      That is what brings the Appellant/OP in appeal before this Commission.

3.     We have heard Shri Deepak Mittal, Counsel for the Appellant at the admission stage as there is no need to hear the Respondent.

4.      The version of the Appellant/OP for his non-appearance on the date fixed is that on the previous date, the Clerk of the Counsel for the Appellant noted the wrong date as 4.7.14 whereas it was 1.7.14 and the District Forum proceeded exparte against the Appellant on 1.7.14.  In support of his contention, Appellant has filed an affidavit. There is no plausible reason not to rely and not to act upon this version of the appellant. Besides that it has never been the policy of law to stifle a contest and wherever possible, under the circumstances a lenient view in this regard has been recommended, so that the parties may have an opportunity to present their case before the Forum, so that the matter may be decided on merit. We therefore, allow the appeal setting aside the ex-parte orders dated 1.7.14 in question, subject to payment of costs of Rs.2,000/- which the OP will pay to the complainant on the next date.  The case is remanded back to the District Forum-III, New Delhi with the direction that they will allow the Appellant/OP to file the evidence and decide the case after hearing both the parties. The Appellant/OP is directed to appear before the District Forum-III, New Delhi on 16.9.14.

 

 

 

 

 

5.   A copy of this order be sent to District Forum-III, New Delhi to keep it on complaint file and for compliance.

 

 

 
 
[HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE N.P KAUSHIK]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.