NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/3427/2009

DHBVNL - Complainant(s)

Versus

SANDEEP LAMINATIONS - Opp.Party(s)

MS. SUKHDA PRITAM

22 Oct 2009

ORDER

Date of Filing: 09 Sep 2009

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/3427/2009
(Against the Order dated 01/12/2008 in Appeal No. 1083/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. DHBVNLSub Divisional Officer (O.P's), Sub Division, Udyog ViharPanchkulaHaryana ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. SANDEEP LAMINATIONSThrough its Manager (works), Incharge Gulshan Kumar, Plot No. 471, Udyog Vihar, Ph-5Gurgaon ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN ,PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. B.K. TAIMNI ,MEMBER
For the Appellant :NEMO
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 22 Oct 2009
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

          Present Revision Petition has been filed with a delay of                  192 days which is over and above the statutory period of 90 days given for filing the revision petition.  State Commission has dismissed the appeal on the ground of delay of 125 days whereas the statutory period was 30 days for filing the revision petition.  State Commission has dismissed the appeal on the ground that the petitioner had failed to show sufficient cause for condonation of delay.

 

-2-

The only reasons for condonation of delay given before us is that the file was sent to the higher officials for approval for filing revision petition.  We are not satisfied with the cause shown for condonation of delay.  Even on merits, we agree with the view taken by the State Commission that the petitioner had failed to show sufficient cause for delayed filing of the appeal.  Revision petition is dismissed.



......................JASHOK BHANPRESIDENT
......................B.K. TAIMNIMEMBER