Madhya Pradesh

StateCommission

A/14/2326

SANJAY S.RATHORE - Complainant(s)

Versus

SAND SHOPPING HUB - Opp.Party(s)

SH.H.SHARMA

04 Jul 2024

ORDER

M. P. STATE  CONSUMER  DISPUTES  REDRESSAL  COMMISSION,                         

PLOT NO.76, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL

 

FIRST APPEAL NO. 2326 OF 2014

(Arising out of order dated 18.11.2014 passed in C.C.No.516/2014 by District Commission, Gwalior)

 

SANJAY SINGH RATHORE,

S/O SHRI U. S. RATHORE,

R/O BM-237, DEENDAYAL NAGAR,

BHIND ROAD, GWALIOR (M.P.)                                                                 … APPELLANT.

 

                  Versus

 

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR,

SAND SHOPPING HUB,

OFFICE NO.301, AGRAWAL COMPLEX,

S-524 SCHOOL BLOCK, SHAKARPUR,

DELHI-110 092.                                                                                           …. RESPONDENT.  

 

 

BEFORE :

            HON’BLE SHRI A. K. TIWARI                : ACTING PRESIDENT

            HON’BLE DR. SRIKANT PANDEY        :          MEMBER

                       

COUNSEL FOR PARTIES :

                Shri Hemant Sharma, learned counsel for the appellant.

           None for the respondent.

 

O R D E R

(Passed On 04.07.2024)

 

         The following order of the Commission was delivered by A. K. Tiwari, Acting President:

                        This appeal by the complainant/appellant is directed against the order dated 18.11.2014 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Gwalior (for short ‘District Commission’) in C.C.No.516/2014, whereby the complainant’s complaint has been dismissed as not maintainable at the admission stage.

-2-

2.                Heard learned counsel for the appellant. Perused the record.

3.                The complainant/appellant filed a complaint before the District Commission alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on part of opposite party/respondent in not providing the facilities and benefits as assured by them despite receiving the amount of Rs.12,00,000/-. He has submitted that on 16.02.2012 he received a call from the opposite party’s executive that the opposite party is running a contest and if he will participate he would get some cash prize of Rs.19 lakhs and benefits in placing the order with the opposite party. He paid Rs.12,00,000/- via online to opposite party. However, the complainant neither received money nor any kind of positive response from the opposite party though he received number of products as a complimentary gift from the opposite party which he never ordered.  However, the District Commission dismissed the complaint as not maintainable at the admission stage.

4.                After hearing learned counsel for the complainant/appellant and on perusal of impugned order as also appeal memo we are of considered view that the notice of the complaint ought to have been issued to the opposite party and thereafter the evidence brought on record by the parties should have been considered.   Subsequently, an order should have been passed after taking into consideration the version of both parties. 

5.                Therefore, in the light of the aforesaid, we are of considered view that the case deserves to be decided after issuance of notice to the opposite parties. The matter is therefore remanded back to the District Commission for

-3-

decision afresh, after issuing notice to the opposite parties. Accordingly, the impugned order is set-aside and the matter is remanded to the District Commission.

6.                Parties are directed to appear before the District Commission on 05.08.2024.

7.                The District Commission is directed to proceed further in the matter, in accordance with law. All the questions involved in the matter including maintainability are kept open.

8.                The District Commission shall decide the complaint in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.

9.                With the aforesaid observations and directions, this appeal stands disposed of.

             (A. K. Tiwari)              (Dr. Srikant Pandey)  

                  Acting President                      Member                    

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.