ORAL ORDER

Per – Hon’ble Mr. Onkar G. Patil, Presiding Member

          None present for the Complainant even on second call.  Today Complainant failed to appear before this Forum without any sufficient reason.  So was position even on previous two adjourned dates viz. 06/02/2017 and 29/11/2016.  Not only this but also Complainant failed to take appropriate steps for service of notice to the Opposite Party in compliance with earlier order dated 27/09/2016.  Thus, it appears to this Forum that Complainant has lost interest in further prosecution of present consumer complaint.  In such circumstances, it is not desirable to prolong the case.  Hence, consumer complaint stands dismissed for want of prosecution in accordance with the provisions of Section-13(2)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 read with Rule-4(7) of the Maharashtra Consumer Protection Rules, 2000.  Parties shall bear their own costs.

Pronounced on 07^th April, 2017