View 5090 Cases Against Samsung
View 5090 Cases Against Samsung
T S Naveen Chandar filed a consumer case on 25 Feb 2019 against Samsung India in the South Chennai Consumer Court. The case no is CC/402/2017 and the judgment uploaded on 21 May 2019.
Date of Filing : 08.09.2017 Date of Order : 25.02.2019
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)
@ 2ND Floor, T.N.P.S.C. Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3.
PRESENT: THIRU. M. MONY, B.Sc., L.L.B, M.L. : PRESIDENT
TR. R. BASKARKUMARAVEL, B.Sc., L.L.M., BPT., PGDCLP., : MEMBER-II
C.C. No.402/2017
DATED THIS MONDAY THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019
T.S. Naveen Chandhar,
S/o. K.T. Stalin Selvaraj,
No.2/11, Appankovil Post,
Varatharajapuram,
Srivaikundam Taluk,
Thoothukudi District. .. Complainant.
..Versus..
1. M/s. Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd.,
Represented by its Managing Director,
2nd, 3rd & 4th Floors, Tower ‘C’,
Vilpul Tech Square,
Old Golf Road,
Sector – 43,
Gurgaon - 122 002.
2. Cell Tech,
Represented by its Manager,
Samsung Authorized Service Centre,
No.193, Anna Salai,
Chennai – 600 002.
3. Aravindha Cell phone,
Represented by its Manager,
No.16, Dudely School Complex,
Near Meenakshi Bhavan,
Dindigul – 1.
4. TVS Electronics Limited,
Represented by its Manager,
Samsung Authorized Service Centre,
Ground Floor, Bascon Tower,
Kodambakkam High Road,
Chennai – 600 034. .. Opposite parties.
Counsel for the complainant : M/s. APR Associates
Counsel for the 1st opposite party : M/s. V.V. Giridhar & others
2nd opposite party : Dismissed for default on
15.11.2018
Opposite parties 3 & 4 : Exparte
ORDER
THIRU. M. MONY, PRESIDENT
This complaint has been filed by the complainant against the opposite parties under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 praying to refund a sum of Rs.37,000/- being the cost price of mobile with interest at the rate of 18% p.a. from the date of purchase to till the date of realization, to pay a sum of Rs.9,709/- being paid towards replacement of the mobile display and pay a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- towards compensation for untold hardship, inconvenience, mental agony, stress with cost to the complainant.
Proof Affidavit of the complainant is not filed for a long time to prove the allegations in the complaint. The complainant and Counsel absent for a long time. Hence, this complaint is dismissed for default.
Dated this Monday the 25th Day of February 2019.
MEMBER-II PRESIDENT
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.