Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/334/2022

Sanjay muralee - Complainant(s)

Versus

Samsung India - Opp.Party(s)

12 Nov 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SISUVIHAR LANE
VAZHUTHACAUD
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
695010
 
Complaint Case No. CC/334/2022
( Date of Filing : 24 Aug 2022 )
 
1. Sanjay muralee
kazhakuttam,Trivandrum
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Samsung India
Bengalore,karnataka
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 12 Nov 2022
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAUD : THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

PRESENT

 

SRI.  P.V. JAYARAJAN                              :           PRESIDENT

SMT. PREETHA G. NAIR                           :           MEMBER

SRI. VIJU  V.R.                                             :           MEMBER

C.C.No. 334/2022 Filed on 24/08/2022

ORDER DATED: 12/11/2022

 

Complainant

:

Sanjay Muralee @ Sanjay, S/0.Muraleedharan, Omkaram, Sauhardda Nagar – 153, Near KSEB substation, Kazhakuttom, Thiruvananthapruam.

                    (By Adv.G.S.Rajeev)

Opposite parties

:

  1. Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd., Rep.by its Managing Director, VC 4H+9FH, Bengaluru, Karnataka -560 074.

(By Adv.Reena Williams)

  1. Nandilath G-Mart Rep. by its Managing Director, K.J.Square, Near Karaman bridge, Karamana.P.O., Thiruvananthapruam – 695 002.
  2. Propritor, Samsung Service Centre, T.C.28/986(1), SWARA-46, Near Sreekanteswaram Temple, Vanchiyoor.P.O., Thiruvananthapruam – 695 035.

 

ORDER

SMT. PREETHA G. NAIR: MEMBER

This is a complaint filed under section 35 of Consumer Protection Act 2019 and the matter stood over to this date for consideration.After hearing the matter the commission passed an order as follows:

This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties.  When the case came up for consideration on 21/10/2022, both the parties submitted that there is a chance of settlement and hence the matter was referred to the settlement talk scheduled to be held on 12/11/2022.  On 12/11/2022 both parties filed a compromise memo stating that the matter is settled for an amount of
Rs.59,299/-.  As per the memo of compromise the opposite party has agreed to issue coupon for Rs.59,299/- to the complainant within 30 days from the date of settlement.  The complainant also agreed to return the subject matter TV set to the opposite parties.  The memo of compromise signed and filed by both parties is accepted and recorded.  In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties to the proceedings, we find that the complaint is to be allowed in terms of compromise. 

In the result the complaint is allowed in terms of compromise.  The memo of compromise dated 12/11/2022 shall form part of this order.         

A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Court, this the 12th  day of November,  2022.

 

Sd/-

P.V. JAYARAJAN

:

PRESIDENT

Sd/-

PREETHA G. NAIR

 

:

 

      MEMBER

Sd/-

VIJU  V.R.

:

MEMBER

 

R

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.