Haryana

Kaithal

318/20

Babi Ram - Complainant(s)

Versus

Samsung India Electronics - Opp.Party(s)

Sh.Aditya Garg

18 Dec 2023

ORDER

                  

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KAITHAL

 

                                                               Complaint Case No.           318 of 2020.

                                                               Date of institution:             06.10.2020.

                                                                 

Babi Ram s/o Shri Chakkar Ram, r/o village Kharkan, Tehsil Guhla, District Kaithal.

                                                                                       …Complainant.

                                                   Versus

 

1. Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd., B-I, Sector-81, Phase-II, Noida, District Gautam Budh Nagar, U.P.
2. Samsung Care Centre, Shiv Telecom Company, Neta Ji Subhash Nagar, Guhla-Cheeka Road, Salimpur, Cheeka, District Kaithal, through its Manager.
3. Jindal Stabilizer, 15 Industrial Area, Cheeka, Tehsil Guhla, District Kaithal, through its Proprietor.
4. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance company Limited, office at Lala Charan Dass Marg, Near Bullet Agency, Kaithal, through its Manager/Authorized Person.
5.  Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited, office at Bajaj Allianz House, Airport Road, Yerwada, Pune-411006 through its Branch Manager.

...Opposite Parties

 

          Complaint under Section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act

 

Present:       Shri Aditya Garg, Advocate for the complainant.

                   Shri Vikram Tiwari, Advocate for OP No.1.

                   Shri C.L. Uppal, Advocate for OP No.5.

                   OPs No.2 & 3 ex-parte.

                   OP No.4 yet not served.

 

ORDER:

 

                   Notice to OP No.4 could not be issued for want of correct address, RC etc. However, learned counsel for OP No.5 has suffered a statement to the effect that OP No.5 Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. is ready to give the cheque of Rs.13162/- in favour of complainant. Learned counsel for the complainant has also made a statement to the effect that in view of above-mentioned statement of counsel for OP No.5, he is ready to accept the above-said cheque amounting to Rs.13162/- in favour of complainant. Heard.

                    In view of above-mentioned statements, present complaint is hereby disposed of. However, it is made clear that both the parties shall remain bound, by their own respective statements. File be consigned to records, after due compliance. 

Announced:

Dt.:18.12.2023.

                                                                                       (Neelam Kashyap)

                                                                                       President.

 

(Sunil Mohan Trikha).             (Suman Rana).              

Member.                                  Member.