Haryana

Karnal

CC/389/2016

Abhishek Dahiya - Complainant(s)

Versus

Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

B.R. Dahiya

23 Feb 2017

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.

                                                               Complaint No.389 of 2016

                                                               Date of instt.: 19.12.2016

                                                               Date of decision 23.2.2017  

Abhishek Dahiya, Advocate son of Shri B.R. Dahiya Advocate, resident of House no.444, Sector-6, Karnal.

…………..Complainant.

                                                Versus

1.Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. & Samsung Customer Service, Suit no.101-103, 1^st floor, Copia Corporate Suites plot no.9, Jasola, District Centre, New Delhi-110025 through its Manager.

2. Keshav Mobile Gallery, 302-A, Old Char Chaman, Link Road, Urban Estate, Karnal.

3. Telus Global Verifacts Solutions, Shop no.20,21,22 Asa Ram Market, Karnal Service Center

.                                                                           ………… Opposite Parties.

                     Complaint u/s 12  of the Consumer Protection Act

Before:         Sh.K.C.Sharma……….President.

                   Sh.Anil Sharma…….Member.

 

Present:        Sh. Abhishek Dahiya Advocate for the complainant.

                   Sh. Dheeraj Sachdeva Advocate for opposite parties no.1 and 3.

                   Opposite party no.2 exparte.

 

ORDER:

                   File taken up in Lok Adalat. The matter has been compromised between the parties amicably. The Learned counsel for the Opposite Parties no.1 and 3 made statement that opposite parties are ready to make the payment of depreciated amount of Rs.15,000/-  within 45 days provided  old mobile set alongwith accessories is deposited with the company.

               Thereafter, learned counsel for the complainant made statement that having regard to the statement of the learned counsel for the Opposite Parties, he does not want to pursue with the present complaint and withdraw the same.

2.                 In view of that the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn having been compromised. However, both the parties shall be bound by their respective statements. The parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and the file be consigned to the record room after due compliance.

Announced
Dated:23.2.2017

                                                                         (K.C.Sharma)

                                                                             President,

                                                                   District Consumer Disputes

                                                                    Redressal Forum, Karnal.

                             (Anil Sharma ) 

                                Member.