Haryana

Karnal

CC/232/2016

Ashish Nagi - Complainant(s)

Versus

Samsung India Electronics Private Limited & Samsung Customer Service - Opp.Party(s)

Parshant Pahwa

23 Feb 2017

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.

                                                               Complaint No.232 of 2016

                                                               Date of instt.: 04.08.2016

                                                               Date of decision 23.2.2017

Ashish Negi son of Shri Mahabir resident of Bakra Market, Sadar Bazar,Karnal.

…………..Complainant.

                                                Versus

1.Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. & Samsung Customer Service, Suit no.101-103, 1^st floor, Copia Corporate Suites plot no.9, Jasola, District Centre, New Delhi-110025 through its Manager.

2. Mobile Mart, opp. Liberty Showroom, near Furniture Market, Old G.T. Road, Karnal authorized signatory.

3. Telus Global Verifacts Solutions, shop no.20,21,22 Asa Ram Market, Karnal Service Center.

                                                                           ………… Opposite Parties.

                     Complaint u/s 12  of the Consumer Protection Act

Before:         Sh.K.C.Sharma……….President.

                   Sh.Anil Sharma…….Member.

 

Present:        Sh. Parshant Pahwa Advocate for the complainant.

                   Sh. Dheeraj Sachdeva Advocate for opposite parties no.1 and 3.

                   Opposite party no.2 exparte.

 

ORDER:

                   File taken up in Lok Adalat. The matter has been compromised between the parties amicably. The Learned counsel for the Opposite Parties no.1 and 3 made statement that opposite parties are ready to make the payment of depreciated amount of the mobile of Rs.11,000/- within 45 days, provided old mobile set alongwith accessories is deposited with the company.

               Thereafter, learned counsel for the complainant made statement that having regard to the statement of the learned counsel for the Opposite Parties, he does not want to pursue with the present complaint and withdraw the same.

                   In view of that the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn having been compromised. However, both the parties shall be bound by their respective statements. The parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and the file be consigned to the record room after due compliance.

Announced
Dated:23.2.2017

                                                                         (K.C.Sharma)

                                                                             President,

                                                                   District Consumer Disputes

                                                                    Redressal Forum, Karnal.

                             (Anil Sharma ) 

                                Member.