Haryana

Karnal

CC/478/2023

Rashmi Gulati - Complainant(s)

Versus

Samsung India Electronics Private Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Nitin Kumar

31 Jan 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                         Complaint No.478 of 2023

                                                          Date of instt.24.08.2023

                                                          Date of Decision:31.01.2024

 

Rashmi Gulati wife of Dr. J.K.Gulati both residents of House No.86-B, Model Town, Karnal.

…….Complainant

                                        Versus

1. Samsungh India Electronic Pvt. Ltd., 6^th floor DLF Centre, Sansad Marg, New Delhi-110001, through its Managing Director/authorized person.
2. Samsung Customer Service Center, shop No.20 to 22, Asa Ram Market, Saini Colony, Model Town Karnal through its proprietor/authorized person.
3. Samsung Customer Service Center, shop No.536, railway road, Karnal through its proprietor/authorized person Mr. Hemant.

 

                                                                …..Opposite parties.

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

                Dr. Suman Singh………….Member.

       

Present:  Sh. Nitin Kumar, counsel for the complainant.

                   Sh. Dheeraj Sachdeva, counsel for the OP-1.

                            

 

                   File taken up today on the application moved by the complainant and OP-1 for permission to withdraw the present complaint.

                   At this stage, learned counsel for the OP-1 has suffered a separate statement that the OP-1 is ready to pay Rs.80,750/- i.e. 85% depreciated amount of the invoice amount with 45 days from the date of receipt of the order.

                   On the other hand, learned counsel for the complainant suffered his separate statement to the effect that the matter has been compromised with the OP-1. He agrees to the statement given by the counsel for the OP-1, so he does not want to pursue with the present complaint further and withdraws the same being compromised.

                 In view of the above statements, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn being compromised. Both parties will bound the statement of their respective counsels. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Dated:31.01.2024                 

                     President, 

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

(Vineet Kaushik)   (Dr. Suman Singh) 

  Member                    Member