Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/146/2020

Bindhu - Complainant(s)

Versus

Samsung India Electronics (P)ltd - Opp.Party(s)

29 Sep 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SISUVIHAR LANE
VAZHUTHACAUD
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
695010
 
Complaint Case No. CC/146/2020
( Date of Filing : 05 Aug 2020 )
 
1. Bindhu
Naveen Bhavan,manchadi,peyadu,Trivandrum
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Samsung India Electronics (P)ltd
6th floor,DLF centre,sansad marg,New delhi
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 29 Sep 2022
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAUD : THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

PRESENT

 

SRI.  P.V. JAYARAJAN                              :           PRESIDENT

SMT. PREETHA G. NAIR                           :           MEMBER

SRI. VIJU  V.R.                                             :           MEMBER

C.C.No. 146/2020 Filed on 05/08/2020

ORDER DATED: 29/09/2022

 

Complainant

:

Bindhu, W/o.Babu, Naveen Bhavan, Manchadi, Peyadu.P.O., Thiruvananthapuram -32.

                   (Party in person)

Opposite parties

:

  1. The Managing Director, Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd., 6th floor, DLF Centre, Sansad Marg, New Delhi – 110 001.

(By Adv.Reena Williams)

  1. The General Manager, Samsung Authorised Service Centre, TC.3/2238, 1st floor, Sophiya Building, Thiruvananthapuram – 695 004.
  2. The Proprietor, Mastro Fone, Opposite HP Petrol Pump, C.R.Complex, Thiruvananthapuram – 695 004.

 

ORDER

 

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN: PRESIDENT

This is a complaint filed under section 35 of Consumer Protection Act 2019 and the matter stood over to this date for consideration.After hearing the matter the commission passed an order as follows:

This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties.  After admitting the complaint notice was issued to the opposite parties.  1st opposite party though entered appearance, not filed version within the stipulated time.  Notice to the 2nd and 3rd opposite parties served and they have not appeared and hence on 05/11/2021 the 2nd and 3rd opposite parties were called absent and set ex parte.  As the complainant was continuously absent, this Commission issued a notice to the complainant to appear before this Commission today to further proceed with this complaint.  The said notice issued to the complainant was returned with endorsement ‘unclaimed’.  The complainant also not filed affidavit.  From the above circumstances we find that the complainant is not interested to further proceed with this complaint. 

                        In the result the complaint is dismissed for default.  There will be no order as to cost.

 

A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Court, this the 29th day of September,  2022.

 

Sd/-

P.V. JAYARAJAN

:

PRESIDENT

Sd/-

PREETHA G. NAIR

 

:

 

      MEMBER

Sd/-

VIJU  V.R.

:

MEMBER

 

R

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.