NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/2314/2009

SONA CHAND BOYED - Complainant(s)

Versus

SAMIRAN BANIK - Opp.Party(s)

M/S. RAJA CHATTERJEE & ASSOCIATES

17 Jul 2009

ORDER

Date of Filing: 01 Jul 2009

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/2314/2009
(Against the Order dated 29/05/2009 in Appeal No. 10/2009 of the State Commission West Bengal)
1. SONA CHAND BOYEDS/o. Late Rikhab Chand Boyed 9/10. Sitanath bose Lane Salika . Police Station . Golabari Howrah.West Bengal ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. SAMIRAN BANIKAA -267 Salt Take. Police Station Bidhan Nagar Kolkata -64. West Bengal ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN ,PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. B.K. TAIMNI ,MEMBER
For the Appellant :M/S. RAJA CHATTERJEE & ASSOCIATES
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 17 Jul 2009
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

We agree with the view taken by the State Commission.

Under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 in Revisional jurisdiction this Commission can interfere only if the State Commission exercises jurisdiction not vested in it by law, or has failed to exercise a jurisdiction so vested, or has acted in the exercise of its jurisdiction illegally or with material irregularity.

 

-2-

We agree with the findings recorded by the State Commission and do not find that there has been any material irregularity in the exercise of jurisdiction on either of accounts mentioned in Section 21 of the Act.  Dismissed.



......................JASHOK BHANPRESIDENT
......................B.K. TAIMNIMEMBER